Skip to main content

List-operations only when restrictions are fulfilled (Part 2)


Consider the following:


data={{{3544128000, 80}, {3544732800, 80}, {3545337600, 80},
{3545942400, 80}, {3545942400, 160}, {3546547200, 160}, {3547152000, 0}}};


After the satisfying answers to my former question (Part 1), another issue occurred, but with the same background (List-operations only when restrictions are fulfilled):


After applying


Transpose[{#[[All, 1, 1]], 
      Total[#[[All, All, 2]], {2}]}] &[#] & /@ (GatherBy[#, First] & /@
    data)

on data (thanks to Andy Ross for the approach), I receive


{{{3544128000, 80}, {3544732800, 80}, {3545337600, 80}, {3545942400, 240},
{3546547200, 160}, {3547152000, 0}}}


which resembles to


{{x_-n*604800_, y_},...,{x_-604800_, y_}, {x_, u_},
{x+604800_, z_},{x_+2*604800_, z_},...,{x_+m*604800_, z_}}

I would like to do the following:



  1. u_->y_ (Transform u_ to y_)

  2. residual=(y_-u_)/(n+1) (Calculate residual of y_ and u_ and divide it be n+1)

  3. {{x-n*604800_, y_+residual},...,{x-604800_, y_+residual}, {x_, y_+residual},{x+604800_, z_},{x_+2*604800_, z_},...,{x_+m*604800_, z_}} (Distribute residual to all periods from x_-n*604800 to x_)



The result in case of data will then be:


{{{3544128000, 120}, {3544732800, 120}, {3545337600, 120}, {3545942400, 120},
    {3546547200, 160}, {3547152000, 0}}}

For better understanding, please consider the following examples:


Example1 = {5, 5, 5, 2, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4};
MyFunction@Example1
{5, 5, 5, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4}


Example2 = {2, 2, 2, 6, 4, 4, 4};
MyFunction@Example2
{3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4}

Example3 = {2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4};
MyFunction@Example3
{2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4}

MyFunction detects a peak within the dataset and "kills" it by replacing the peak and the preceding sequence (with constant values) with y+residual (see 2., Example1 and Example2). It is important that MyFunction returns the original list when no peak occurs in the list (see Example 3.).




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more