Skip to main content

graphics - Undocumented form for FilledCurve[]


New in Mathematica 8 is FilledCurve (and its cousin JoinedCurve). The docs state that this function can take a list of segments or components, each in the form of a Line, a BezierCurve, or a BSplineCurve. But the examples show alteration of a glyph, with a resulting JoinedCurve that has a different pattern. Here is a simplified example:


ImportString[ExportString[
Style["\[FilledCircle]", Bold, FontFamily -> "Helvetica", FontSize -> 12],
"PDF"],"TextMode" -> "Outlines"][[1, 1, 2, 1, 1]]

gives


FilledCurve[{{{1, 4, 3}, {1, 3, 3}, {1, 3, 3}, {1, 3, 3}}}, 
{{{10.9614, 7.40213}, {10.9614, 10.2686}, {8.51663, 12.3137},
{5.79394, 12.3137}, {3.05663, 12.3137}, {0.641063, 10.2686},

{0.641063, 7.40213}, {0.641063, 4.53319}, {3.05663, 2.48813},
{5.79394, 2.48813}, {8.53125, 2.48813}, {10.9614, 4.51856},
{10.9614, 7.40213}}}]

The second argument is a list of points representing the glyph. The first list is some representation of smoothing the boundary given by the second list. For example, displaying the points alone as connected line segments


Graphics@Line[ImportString[ExportString[
Style["\[FilledCircle]", Bold, FontFamily -> "Helvetica",
FontSize -> 12], "PDF"], "TextMode" -> "Outlines"][[1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1]]]

gives



Connected line segments for FilledCurve[] glyph


Compare that with the JoinedCurve version:


Graphics[ImportString[
ExportString[Style["\[FilledCircle]", Bold, FontFamily -> "Helvetica",
FontSize -> 12], "PDF"], "TextMode" -> "Outlines"][[1, 1, 2, 1, 1]]
/. FilledCurve[a__] :> JoinedCurve[a]]

JoinedCurve version of the gylph



  1. What exactly do the triples in the first list represent?


  2. How can I reconstruct the smooth circle using other Graphics primitives, such as BSplineCurve?


My motivation is to be able to extract the curves from 2D glyphs and plot them in Graphics3D[] (e.g., with the replacement {x_Real,y_Real}:>{Cos[theta]x,Sin[theta]x,y}), since FilledCurve[] only works with Graphics[].



Answer



The first element in the triples seems to indicate the type of curve used for the segment where 0 indicates a Line, 1 a BezierCurve, and 3 a BSplineCurve. I haven't figured out yet what 2 does.


Edit: When the first element of the triple is 2, the segment will be a BezierCurve similar to option 1 except that with option 2, an extra control point is added to the list to make sure that the current segment is tangential to the previous segment.


The second digit indicates how many points to use for the segment, and the last digit the SplineDegree. To convert the FilledCurve to a list of Graphics primitives, you could therefore do something like


conversion[curve_] :=
Module[{ff},


ff[i_, pts_, deg_] :=
Switch[i,
0, Line[Rest[pts]],
1, BezierCurve[Rest[pts], SplineDegree -> deg],
2, BezierCurve[
Join[{pts[[2]], 2 pts[[2]] - pts[[1]]}, Drop[pts, 2]],
SplineDegree -> deg],
3, BSplineCurve[Rest[pts], SplineDegree -> deg]
];


Function[{segments, pts},
MapThread[ff,
{
segments[[All, 1]],
pts[[Range @@ (#1 - {1, 0})]] & /@
Partition[Accumulate[segments[[All, 2]]], 2, 1, {-1, -1}, 1],
segments[[All, 3]]
}
]
] @@@ Transpose[List @@ curve]

]

Then for the example in the original post,


curve = FilledCurve[{{{1, 4, 3}, {1, 3, 3}, {1, 3, 3}, {1, 3, 3}}}, 
{{{10.9614, 7.40213}, {10.9614, 10.2686}, {8.51663, 12.3137},
{5.79394, 12.3137}, {3.05663, 12.3137}, {0.641063, 10.2686},
{0.641063, 7.40213}, {0.641063, 4.53319}, {3.05663, 2.48813},
{5.79394, 2.48813}, {8.53125, 2.48813}, {10.9614, 4.51856},
{10.9614, 7.40213}}}];
curve2 = conversion[curve]


gives


{BezierCurve[{{10.9614, 7.40213}, {10.9614, 10.2686}, {8.51663, 
12.3137}, {5.79394, 12.3137}}, SplineDegree -> 3],
BezierCurve[{{5.79394, 12.3137}, {3.05663, 12.3137}, {0.641063,
10.2686}, {0.641063, 7.40213}}, SplineDegree -> 3],
BezierCurve[{{0.641063, 7.40213}, {0.641063, 4.53319}, {3.05663,
2.48813}, {5.79394, 2.48813}}, SplineDegree -> 3],
BezierCurve[{{5.79394, 2.48813}, {8.53125, 2.48813}, {10.9614,
4.51856}, {10.9614, 7.40213}}, SplineDegree -> 3]}


and Graphics[curve2] produces


converted FilledCurve


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.