Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Kernel crashes during `LinearProgramming`. Can you reproduce it?


Using the code from this answer for a sufficiently large problem setting crashes my kernel. I'll copy/paste the code here:


n = 12;
m = 4;
costs = Range@n/2 // N;


vars = Flatten@{
    Array[x, {n, m}],
    Array[y, m],
    z
    };

constraints = Flatten@{
    Table[Sum[x[i, j], {j, m}] == 1, {i, n}],
    Table[y[j] == Sum[x[i, j] costs[[i]], {i, n}], {j, m}],

    Table[z >= y[j], {j, m}]
    };

bm = CoefficientArrays[Equal @@@ constraints, vars];
solution = LinearProgramming[
   Last@CoefficientArrays[z, vars],
   bm[[2]],
   Transpose@{-bm[[1]], 
     constraints[[All, 0]] /. {Equal -> 0, GreaterEqual -> 1}},
   vars /. {_x -> {0, 1}, (_y | z) -> {0, \[Infinity]}},

   vars /. {_x -> Integers, (_y | z) -> Reals}
   ];


Cases[Pick[vars, solution, 1], x[ij__] :> {ij}];
GroupBy[%, Last -> First] // Values // SortBy[First]

Running this for n=40 yields a result almost instantly, whereas n=60 leads to this


enter image description here


after a minute or so. I am using Mathematica 10.0.1 on Windows 8 64bit. Can you reproduce this behavior? If so, do you have an idea why it is happening?



Small update The kernel crash really appears to be due to LinearProgramming. Everything that is set before or is called within LinearProgramming evaluates basically instantly without issues. Only when solution is evaluated, the kernel crashes - on a Linux x64 it stays alive but Mathematica 10.0.2 freezes and does not return a result even after an hour.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more