Skip to main content

list manipulation - UnFlatten an array into a ragged matrix


Trying to unflatten an array that was part of ragged array of sub matrices.


As input we have flattened array:


  myflatarray={7.7056, 4.20225, 3.02775, 7.60807, 9.77169, 6.18476, 4.80993,
   6.32965, 2.69882, 0.268505, 1.78048, 9.67702, 0.875699, 7.18504, 
   1.62811, 0.0313174, 5.66048, 1.61613, 5.71987, 0.971484, 3.87503, 
   2.8537, 2.68776, 3.47433, 2.81483, 4.0387, 1.74939, 3.12037, 4.18016, 
   2.35264, 0.853583, 1.22412, 0.382633, 3.67874, 8.68059, 8.02419, 
   6.9547, 7.11112};


and the original dimensions of the submatrices in the ragged array.


  mydimensions={{4, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 3}};

In other words the original object looked like


 original={
  {{7.7056, 4.20225, 3.02775, 7.60807, 9.77169}, 
   {6.18476, 4.80993, 6.32965, 2.69882, 0.268505}, 
   {1.78048, 9.67702, 0.875699, 7.18504, 1.62811}, 
   {0.0313174, 5.66048, 1.61613, 5.71987,  0.971484}}, 
  {{3.87503, 2.8537, 2.68776, 3.47433}, 

   {2.81483, 4.0387,1.74939, 3.12037}, 
   {4.18016, 2.35264, 0.853583, 1.22412}}, 
  {{0.382633, 3.67874, 8.68059}, 
   {8.02419, 6.9547, 7.11112}}
 };

I tried using the undocumented function Internal`Deflatten, and it didn't work, but I was happy that it didn't crash my kernel!


I'm able to do it rather inefficiently this way:


  arraytoweights[myflatarray_,mydimensions_]:=
  MapIndexed[Partition[#1, mydimensions[[Last@#2, 1]]] &, 

  Take[myflatarray, #] & /@ ((# - {0, 1}) & /@ (Partition[
  FoldList[Plus, 1, (Times @@@ mydimensions)], 2, 1]))];

My main problem is that this is part of an optimization function, that needs to be called many times during the optimization, and this is atm the slowest part. It also can't seem to be compiled. I suppose with Compile I have to make sure there are no ragged arrays generated in-between neither. Any suggestions are appreciated!


Edit: So it turns out mine is not as bad as I thought. Though I like the extensions to more structure as @Leonid did. I have no need for it now, but I see how I can use it in the future.


Here is the current tally of the answers and their timing, using a random larger result, the typical size I need. (only with submatrices atm)


    mydimensions = {{30, 4}, {10, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 1}};
    SeedRandom[1345]
    original = ((RandomReal[{0, 10}, ##] & /@ mydimensions));
    myflatarray = Flatten[original];


For the timing I ran the result from each with $10^3$ runs. For example, here the set for my results.


    lalmeiresults = 
         Table[First@
           Timing[lalmei = arraytoweights[myflatarray, mydimensions];],    {i,Range@1000]}]
     lalmei === original



True





Here is the BoxWhiskerChart, with only the 95% quantile, no outliers. (Not sure if this the best way to do timing, but here it goes )


enter image description here


Couple of notes about the image: the distribution of mine and Leonid's, and seismatica's is about the same. Picket's is only a bit larger 25% only.


Mr.Wizard's, kguler's and WReach's results only shoot up as the size of the sub-matrices gets larger.


With a small examples, Mr. Wizard's is the fastest.


      mydimensions = {{3, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 1}};
      SeedRandom[1345]
      original = ((RandomReal[{0, 10}, ##] & /@ mydimensions));


Here the distributions in that case: enter image description here



Answer



Here is a version which is quite general, and based on Mr.Wizard's dynP function:


dynP[l_, p_] := 
   MapThread[l[[# ;; #2]] &, {{0}~Join~Most@# + 1, #} &@Accumulate@p]

ClearAll[tdim];
tdim[{dims__Integer}] := Times[dims];
tdim[dims : {__List}] := Total@Map[tdim, dims];


ClearAll[pragged];
pragged[lst_, {}] := lst;
pragged[lst_, dims : {__Integer}] := 
   Fold[Partition, lst, Most@Reverse@dims];
pragged[lst_, dims : {__List}] := 
   MapThread[pragged, {dynP[lst, tdim /@ dims], dims}];

It may look similar to other answers, but the difference is that it can take more general specs. Example:


pragged[Range[20], {{{2, 3}, {2, 4}}, {2, 3}}]


(* 
   {
     {{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}, {{7, 8, 9, 10}, {11, 12, 13, 14}}}, 
     {{15,16, 17}, {18, 19, 20}}
   }
*)

In general, the specs to pragged will form a tree.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more