Skip to main content

list manipulation - UnFlatten an array into a ragged matrix


Trying to unflatten an array that was part of ragged array of sub matrices.


As input we have flattened array:


  myflatarray={7.7056, 4.20225, 3.02775, 7.60807, 9.77169, 6.18476, 4.80993,
6.32965, 2.69882, 0.268505, 1.78048, 9.67702, 0.875699, 7.18504,
1.62811, 0.0313174, 5.66048, 1.61613, 5.71987, 0.971484, 3.87503,
2.8537, 2.68776, 3.47433, 2.81483, 4.0387, 1.74939, 3.12037, 4.18016,
2.35264, 0.853583, 1.22412, 0.382633, 3.67874, 8.68059, 8.02419,
6.9547, 7.11112};


and the original dimensions of the submatrices in the ragged array.


  mydimensions={{4, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 3}};

In other words the original object looked like


 original={
{{7.7056, 4.20225, 3.02775, 7.60807, 9.77169},
{6.18476, 4.80993, 6.32965, 2.69882, 0.268505},
{1.78048, 9.67702, 0.875699, 7.18504, 1.62811},
{0.0313174, 5.66048, 1.61613, 5.71987, 0.971484}},
{{3.87503, 2.8537, 2.68776, 3.47433},

{2.81483, 4.0387,1.74939, 3.12037},
{4.18016, 2.35264, 0.853583, 1.22412}},
{{0.382633, 3.67874, 8.68059},
{8.02419, 6.9547, 7.11112}}
};

I tried using the undocumented function Internal`Deflatten, and it didn't work, but I was happy that it didn't crash my kernel!


I'm able to do it rather inefficiently this way:


  arraytoweights[myflatarray_,mydimensions_]:=
MapIndexed[Partition[#1, mydimensions[[Last@#2, 1]]] &,

Take[myflatarray, #] & /@ ((# - {0, 1}) & /@ (Partition[
FoldList[Plus, 1, (Times @@@ mydimensions)], 2, 1]))];

My main problem is that this is part of an optimization function, that needs to be called many times during the optimization, and this is atm the slowest part. It also can't seem to be compiled. I suppose with Compile I have to make sure there are no ragged arrays generated in-between neither. Any suggestions are appreciated!


Edit: So it turns out mine is not as bad as I thought. Though I like the extensions to more structure as @Leonid did. I have no need for it now, but I see how I can use it in the future.


Here is the current tally of the answers and their timing, using a random larger result, the typical size I need. (only with submatrices atm)


    mydimensions = {{30, 4}, {10, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 1}};
SeedRandom[1345]
original = ((RandomReal[{0, 10}, ##] & /@ mydimensions));
myflatarray = Flatten[original];


For the timing I ran the result from each with $10^3$ runs. For example, here the set for my results.


    lalmeiresults = 
Table[First@
Timing[lalmei = arraytoweights[myflatarray, mydimensions];], {i,Range@1000]}]
lalmei === original



True





Here is the BoxWhiskerChart, with only the 95% quantile, no outliers. (Not sure if this the best way to do timing, but here it goes )


enter image description here


Couple of notes about the image: the distribution of mine and Leonid's, and seismatica's is about the same. Picket's is only a bit larger 25% only.


Mr.Wizard's, kguler's and WReach's results only shoot up as the size of the sub-matrices gets larger.


With a small examples, Mr. Wizard's is the fastest.


      mydimensions = {{3, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 4}, {2, 1}};
SeedRandom[1345]
original = ((RandomReal[{0, 10}, ##] & /@ mydimensions));


Here the distributions in that case: enter image description here



Answer



Here is a version which is quite general, and based on Mr.Wizard's dynP function:


dynP[l_, p_] := 
MapThread[l[[# ;; #2]] &, {{0}~Join~Most@# + 1, #} &@Accumulate@p]

ClearAll[tdim];
tdim[{dims__Integer}] := Times[dims];
tdim[dims : {__List}] := Total@Map[tdim, dims];


ClearAll[pragged];
pragged[lst_, {}] := lst;
pragged[lst_, dims : {__Integer}] :=
Fold[Partition, lst, Most@Reverse@dims];
pragged[lst_, dims : {__List}] :=
MapThread[pragged, {dynP[lst, tdim /@ dims], dims}];

It may look similar to other answers, but the difference is that it can take more general specs. Example:


pragged[Range[20], {{{2, 3}, {2, 4}}, {2, 3}}]


(*
{
{{{1, 2, 3}, {4, 5, 6}}, {{7, 8, 9, 10}, {11, 12, 13, 14}}},
{{15,16, 17}, {18, 19, 20}}
}
*)

In general, the specs to pragged will form a tree.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...