Skip to main content

numerics - Different floating-point numbers equal?


Let's define two different numbers.


x = 1.

y = 1. + 2^-52 (* equivalently, 1 + $MachineEpsilon *)

Let's make sure they're different with FullForm:


x // FullForm (* 1.` *)
y // FullForm (* 1.0000000000000002` *)

Those look pretty close... let's make sure they're different. I'm not a wizard with the developer tools, but I can export them as IEEE double-precision floating point numbers (which I'd bet is their internal representation):


StringJoin @@ 
IntegerString[Reverse@ToCharacterCode[ExportString[x, "Real64"]],
16, 2]

(* 3ff0000000000000 *)
StringJoin @@
IntegerString[Reverse@ToCharacterCode[ExportString[y, "Real64"]],
16, 2]
(* 3ff0000000000001 *)

We can see that they are indeed different. They represent the two numbers:


$$ \begin{align} x &= (1.){\underbrace{000 \cdots 000}_\text{51 zeros}}0_2 \times 2^{01111111111_2 - 1023} \equiv 1 \\ y &= (1.){\underbrace{000 \cdots 000}_\text{51 zeros}}1_2 \times 2^{01111111111_2 - 1023} \equiv 1 + \frac{1}{2^{52}} \end{align} $$


That is, x is exactly one, and y is the smallest IEEE double greater than one. Ok, so they're different. Hey Mathematica, you know they're diff-


x == y (* True *)


Oh. What if we try-


x === y (* True *)

Hey Python, you use doubles, right? Are you seeing this?


>>> 1. == 1.0000000000000002
False

Maybe it's because you're using quads?


>>> 1. == 1.0000000000000001

True

Yeah, I didn't think so. Mathematica, are you sure? I mean, this doesn't seem right...


y - x (* 2.22045*10^-16 *)

Aha! I knew it! Now let's try this:


y - x == 0 (* False *)

Success! Now let's just double-check (pun intended):


1.0000000000000001 - 1. (* 0. *)

% == 0 (* True *)

So you are using double-precision...


My question is, Why do Equal and SameQ return True, even though these numbers are obviously different? SameQ ignores the last bit, and Equal ignores the last seven bits!



Answer



It seems I found my answer in OleksandrR's comment to this question. He says,



Bear in mind Equal applies an extra tolerance in Mathematica. The proper comparison is


Block[{Internal`$EqualTolerance = -Infinity}, 1 == 1 + $MachineEpsilon] (* False *)
Block[{Internal`$EqualTolerance = -Infinity}, 1 == 1 + $MachineEpsilon/2] (* True *)


In fact, the value of Internal`$EqualTolerance * Log2[10] is 7., meaning that it ignores the last seven bits, just as I discovered!


(Analogously, Internal`$SameQTolerance * Log2[10] is 1., i.e. it drops the last bit.)


Note that this is mentioned in the documentation for Equal, under Details:




  • Approximate numbers with machine precision or higher are considered equal if they differ in at most their last seven binary digits (roughly their last two decimal digits).

  • For numbers below machine precision the required tolerance is reduced in proportion to the precision of the numbers.




However, I never thought to look at it, since (thought) I knew what == means! Lesson learned, always check the documentation, especially if you don't think you need to.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...