parallelization - Raster with ColorFunction is blank when Dynamic Updating is disabled

UPDATE

Today I was having these WaveletScalogram problems again. I think this is ultimately some kind of interaction issue with Dynamic. I have narrowed it down to this:

Graphics[Raster[{{0}}, ColorFunction -> "AvocadoColors"]]

Run this line, and then disable Dynamic Updating ("Evaluation" menu) and run it again. On my computer it comes out blank when Dynamic Updating is disabled. If you remove the ColorFunction option, it will work fine with or without Dynamic Updating. So new question: Why does this happen? Is it a bug? I wonder if others can even reproduce this.

Previous version of this question:

I was trying to export WaveletScalogram plots (to image formats) in parallel, and some of the images were coming out blank. I've managed to reduce the issue to what appears to be quirky Rasterize behavior on WaveletScalogram plots specifically, in parallel computations. I'm on version 8.0.4.0 on Win7 64. With the following:

ParallelTable[

 Rasterize@
  WaveletScalogram[ContinuousWaveletTransform[RandomReal[{0, 1}, 2000]]],
 {f, 4}]

I get:

enter image description here

Change ParallelTable to Table, or remove the Rasterize, and I get:

enter image description here

I'm just wondering if this is actually a bug or I'm just missing something.

update

I was able to get it to work by hard-limiting the number of kernels to the number of cores on my system (a monstrous 2 cores). The "Parallel Kernel config" is a little confusing in this regard, since I have to set it to "1 parallel kernel" to get 2 parallel kernels controlled by a 3rd master kernel O_O Still this Rasterize behavior is uncalled for, I think.

Comments

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....

Blog

Search This Blog