Skip to main content

variable definitions - How to define a vector with automatically added symbolic elements with subscripts


I want to define a vector lets say k containing elements Symbolize[Subscript[k, 1]], k2, k3 ... etc. When I define lets say k4 . I want the symbol automatically added to vector k. Something like below but not working at all.


k /: {k, Symbolize[

ParsedBoxWrapper[
SubscriptBox[
StyleBox["v", FontFamily -> "Courier New", FontWeight -> "Plain",
FontSlant -> "Italic"], "_"]]]} :=
AppendTo[k, Subscript[v, _]];

My Question is;


1) How can I symbolically define elements (with sub scripts) automatically added to a vector.


2) If I assign values to symbols, How can I get elements values only and symbols only.


EDIT 1



Symbolize[Subscript[k, _]] 

Command Symbolizes all subscripts of k e.g. k1 (Subscript[k, 1]), k2 (Subscript[k, 2]) etc. This is fine. What I want is collect k1, k2 k3 in a set (List) k with out additional commands or additional functions. Just as soon as sybolize sub scripted ones it should add it self to set k (sort of pattern maching as in Subscript[k, _]). When I call k it should give me the list {k1, k2, k3}. @Mr. Wizards answer gives the list but as calling function ksym. Sort of what I need but not exactly. @halirutan answer is also interesting but I don' t want to define additional functions or operators (may be as minimum as possible).


EDIT 2


Its sort of bag or set; no order is required, only k1,k3 can be given and k2 can be missing.


EDIT 3


<< Notation`
(*below line symbolizes all subscripted k_]*)
Symbolize[ ParsedBoxWrapper[
SubscriptBox["k", "_"]]]


somewhere here I need additional code that all k_ are added to k once its been defined. For example:


{Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {1, 2, 3}

after that when I ask k it should give me {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} as @Mr.Wizard suggested ksym[] := HoldForm @@@ UpValues[k][[All, 1]] and for values kval[] := UpValues[k][[All, 2]] should work. But, what I' m missing in @Mr.Wizard example is that one needs to define symbols as;


k /: Subscript[k, 1] = "val1";
k /: Subscript[k, 2] = "val2";
k /: Subscript[k, 3] = "val3";

what I need is once I write {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {1, 2, 3} I should be able to get k vector and {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} is appended automatically to k.




Answer



Method #1


If you define each Subscript using TagSet(1)(2) the value will be associated with the Symbol, e.g. k:


k /: Subscript[k, 1] = "val1";
k /: Subscript[k, 2] = "val2";
k /: Subscript[k, 3] = "val3";

You could then use definitions such as:


kval[] := UpValues[k][[All, 2]]


ksym[] := HoldForm @@@ UpValues[k][[All, 1]]

These will always be up to date as they are dynamically generated:


kval[]


{"val1", "val2", "val3"}



ksym[]



{k1, k2, k3}



Each "symbol" name is wrapped in HoldForm to prevent evaluation; ReleaseHold may be used to trigger it.


These definitions assume that no other UpValues for k are generated but if there are that can be addressed with pattern matching at the expense of speed.




Method #2


Following your update EDIT 3 here is another approach you might consider. Start by setting HoldFirst on Subscript so that k may be used without forming an infinite recursion, then make a definition for k that extracts the matching rules from the DownValues list:


SetAttributes[Subscript, HoldFirst]


k := Cases[DownValues@Subscript, (_[x : Subscript[k, _]] :> _) :> Hold[x]]

Make some assignments and check k:


{Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {"a", "b", "c"}

k


{Hold[Subscript[k, 1]], Hold[Subscript[k, 2]], Hold[Subscript[k, 3]]}


The subscripts are returned in held form, for further processing. One can use ReleaseHold to recover the values:


k // ReleaseHold


{"a", "b", "c"}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.