Skip to main content

variable definitions - How to define a vector with automatically added symbolic elements with subscripts


I want to define a vector lets say k containing elements Symbolize[Subscript[k, 1]], k2, k3 ... etc. When I define lets say k4 . I want the symbol automatically added to vector k. Something like below but not working at all.


k /: {k, Symbolize[

ParsedBoxWrapper[
SubscriptBox[
StyleBox["v", FontFamily -> "Courier New", FontWeight -> "Plain",
FontSlant -> "Italic"], "_"]]]} :=
AppendTo[k, Subscript[v, _]];

My Question is;


1) How can I symbolically define elements (with sub scripts) automatically added to a vector.


2) If I assign values to symbols, How can I get elements values only and symbols only.


EDIT 1



Symbolize[Subscript[k, _]] 

Command Symbolizes all subscripts of k e.g. k1 (Subscript[k, 1]), k2 (Subscript[k, 2]) etc. This is fine. What I want is collect k1, k2 k3 in a set (List) k with out additional commands or additional functions. Just as soon as sybolize sub scripted ones it should add it self to set k (sort of pattern maching as in Subscript[k, _]). When I call k it should give me the list {k1, k2, k3}. @Mr. Wizards answer gives the list but as calling function ksym. Sort of what I need but not exactly. @halirutan answer is also interesting but I don' t want to define additional functions or operators (may be as minimum as possible).


EDIT 2


Its sort of bag or set; no order is required, only k1,k3 can be given and k2 can be missing.


EDIT 3


<< Notation`
(*below line symbolizes all subscripted k_]*)
Symbolize[ ParsedBoxWrapper[
SubscriptBox["k", "_"]]]


somewhere here I need additional code that all k_ are added to k once its been defined. For example:


{Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {1, 2, 3}

after that when I ask k it should give me {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} as @Mr.Wizard suggested ksym[] := HoldForm @@@ UpValues[k][[All, 1]] and for values kval[] := UpValues[k][[All, 2]] should work. But, what I' m missing in @Mr.Wizard example is that one needs to define symbols as;


k /: Subscript[k, 1] = "val1";
k /: Subscript[k, 2] = "val2";
k /: Subscript[k, 3] = "val3";

what I need is once I write {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {1, 2, 3} I should be able to get k vector and {Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} is appended automatically to k.




Answer



Method #1


If you define each Subscript using TagSet(1)(2) the value will be associated with the Symbol, e.g. k:


k /: Subscript[k, 1] = "val1";
k /: Subscript[k, 2] = "val2";
k /: Subscript[k, 3] = "val3";

You could then use definitions such as:


kval[] := UpValues[k][[All, 2]]


ksym[] := HoldForm @@@ UpValues[k][[All, 1]]

These will always be up to date as they are dynamically generated:


kval[]


{"val1", "val2", "val3"}



ksym[]



{k1, k2, k3}



Each "symbol" name is wrapped in HoldForm to prevent evaluation; ReleaseHold may be used to trigger it.


These definitions assume that no other UpValues for k are generated but if there are that can be addressed with pattern matching at the expense of speed.




Method #2


Following your update EDIT 3 here is another approach you might consider. Start by setting HoldFirst on Subscript so that k may be used without forming an infinite recursion, then make a definition for k that extracts the matching rules from the DownValues list:


SetAttributes[Subscript, HoldFirst]


k := Cases[DownValues@Subscript, (_[x : Subscript[k, _]] :> _) :> Hold[x]]

Make some assignments and check k:


{Subscript[k, 1], Subscript[k, 2], Subscript[k, 3]} = {"a", "b", "c"}

k


{Hold[Subscript[k, 1]], Hold[Subscript[k, 2]], Hold[Subscript[k, 3]]}


The subscripts are returned in held form, for further processing. One can use ReleaseHold to recover the values:


k // ReleaseHold


{"a", "b", "c"}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...