Skip to main content

plotting - Is there an option to change the space/distance between tick labels and axes labels for plots?


In an attempt to squeeze more plots and controls into the limited space for a demo UI, I am trying to remove any extra white spaces I see.


I am not sure what options to use to reduce the amount of space between the ticks labels and the actual text that represent the labels on the axes.


Here is a small Plot example using Frame->True (I put an outside Frame as well, just for illustration, it is not part of the problem here)


Framed[


Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi},
Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {{Sin[x], None}, {x,
Row[{"This is a plot of ", Sin[x]}]}},
ImagePadding -> {{55, 10}, {35, 20}},
ImageMargins -> 0,
FrameTicksStyle -> 10,
RotateLabel -> False
],


FrameMargins -> 0
]

Mathematica graphics


Is there an option or method to control this distance?


Notice that ImagePadding affects distance below the frame label, and not between the frame label and the ticks. Hence changing ImagePadding will not help here.


Depending on the plot and other things, this space can be more than it should be. The above is just a small example I made up. Here is a small part of a UI, and I think the space between the t(sec) and the ticks is too large. I'd like to reduce it by few pixels. I also might like to push the top label down closer to the plot by few pixels also.


Mathematica graphics


I am Using V9 on windows.


update 12/22/12



Using Labeld solution by @kguler below is a good solution, one just need to be little careful with the type-sitting for the labels. Plot automatically typeset things as Text in TraditionalFormat, which is a nice feature. To do the same when using Labeled one must do this manually using TraditionalForm and Text as well.


Here is example to show the difference


1) Labeled used just with TraditionalForm. The left one uses Plot and the right one uses Labeled with TraditionalForm. Notice the difference in how labels look.


Grid[{
{

Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {{Sin[x], None}, {x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}},
ImageSize -> 300, FrameTicksStyle -> 10, FrameStyle -> 16,RotateLabel -> False],


Labeled[
Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 300],
TraditionalForm /@ {Sin[x], x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}, {Left, Bottom, Top},
Spacings -> {0, 0, 0}, LabelStyle -> "Panel"]
}

}, Frame -> All]

Mathematica graphics


2) Now we do the same, just need to add Text to get the same result as Plot.



Grid[{
{
Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, FrameTicksStyle -> 10,
FrameStyle -> 16,
FrameLabel -> {{Sin[x], None}, {x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}},
ImageSize -> 300, RotateLabel -> False],

Labeled[
Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 300],
Text /@ TraditionalForm /@ {Sin[x], x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}, {Left,

Bottom, Top}, Spacings -> {0, 0, 0}, LabelStyle -> "Panel"]
}

}, Frame -> All]

Mathematica graphics


Update 12/22/12 (2)


There is a big problem with controlling the spacing.


Labeled spacing only seem to work for horizontal and vertical spacing, taken togother.


i.e. One can't control spacing on each side of the plot separately? Here is an example, where I tried to move the bottom axes label up, this ended with moving the top label down as well. Which is not what I want.



Labeled[Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 300], 
Text /@ TraditionalForm /@ {Sin[x], x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}, {Left,
Bottom, Top}, Spacings -> {-.2, -0.7}]

Mathematica graphics


Will see if there is a way to control each side spacing on its own. Trying Spacing->{-0.2,{-0.7,0}} does not work, it seems to take the zero in this case and ignored the -0.7


This gives the same result as above:


Labeled[Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 300], 
Text /@ TraditionalForm /@ {Sin[x], x, E Tan[x] Sin[x]}, {Left,
Bottom, Top}, Spacings -> {-.2, -0.7, .0}]


Mathematica graphics


ps. there might be a way to specify the spacing for each side with some tricky syntax. I have not figured it out yet. Still trying thing.... http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/Spacings.html


update 12/22/12 (3) Using combination of ImagePadding and Spacing should have worked, but for some reason, the top label now is cut off. Please see screen shot. Using V9 on windows


enter image description here


Note: The above seems to be related to the issue reported here: some Graphics output do not fully render on the screen until an extra click is made into the notebook


Need an extra click inside the notebook. Then label become un-chopped !



Answer



The most convenient way I found is to wrap Plot (without FrameLabels and PlotLabel and with appropriate ImagePadding and ImageMargins) inside Labeled and use the Spacings option to position the labels:


 Labeled[Plot[Sin[x], {x, -Pi, Pi}, Frame -> True, 

ImagePadding -> {{20, 1}, {15, 2}}, ImageMargins -> 0,
FrameTicksStyle -> 10, RotateLabel -> False],
TraditionalForm /@ {Sin[x], x, Row[{"This is a plot of ", Sin[x]}]},
{Left, Bottom, Top},
Spacings -> {0, 0}, LabelStyle -> "Panel"]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...