Skip to main content

evaluation - How to NOT simplify fraction


How can I prevent Mathematica from simplifying fractions? What I would like to do is run a test on a list of fractions to see how many are in their reduced form.


For example, I have a list:


1/10, 2/10, 5/10

I do not want Mathematica to treat it as:


1/10, 1/5, 1/2


I would like it left exactly as it was originally entered for comparison, i.e. if one list contains 2/10 and the other list contains 1/5 they should be treated as different elements.


I tried converting the elements to strings but Mathematica still simplified the fractions...


What is the best way to maintain the entire list in the original form?


Something like:


a = {1/10, 2/10, 3/10, 4/10, 5/10};
Internal`RationalNoReduce[Numerator[a], Denominator[a]]

still gives


Internal`RationalNoReduce[{1, 1, 3, 2, 1}, {10, 5, 10, 5, 2}]


Answer



Your expression will be evaluated unless it is entered in a held form, or a form that natively does not evaluate. For example:


a = Hold[1/10, 2/10, 3/10, 4/10, 5/10];

b = {{1,10}, {2,10}, {3,10}, {4,10}, {5,10}};

The second representation is a bit easier to work with as the first, which while not evaluating is nevertheless parsed differently from what you might expect:


a // FullForm



Hold[Times[1, Power[10, -1]], Times[2, Power[10, -1]], Times[3, Power[10, -1]], 
Times[4, Power[10, -1]], Times[5, Power[10, -1]]]

Note that every fraction is not parsed as Rational but as Times and Power.


You can work with either format however. First the easy example (ref: Apply):


GCD @@@ b


{1, 2, 1, 2, 5}


A GCD of one means that the fraction is in reduced form, while any other value means it is not. You could for example Select the fractions that are or are not in reduced form:


Select[b, 1 == GCD @@ # &]


{{1, 10}, {3, 10}}

To work with the first format you could convert it to the second format with:


List @@ (a /. n_*(d_^-1) :> {n, d})



{{1, 10}, {2, 10}, {3, 10}, {4, 10}, {5, 10}}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....