Skip to main content

undocumented - Internal`WithTimeStamps usage


I was digging inside the Iconize implementation a little bit and saw that there's a function BoxForm`BoxFormAutoLoad which loads the FormatValues for objects.


For the most part it's boring, but one interesting function that I saw in it was Internal`WithTimeStamps. A sample usage of BoxForm`BoxFormAutoLoad is:


BoxForm`BoxFormAutoLoad[MakeBoxes, 
IconizedObject["asd"],
StandardForm,
"NotebookTools`Iconize`",

{{IconizedObject, _}},
Hold[IconizedObject]
]

And tracking the WithTimeStamps call inside we see it's running:


Internal`WithTimestampsPreserved[
{IconizedObject},
Apply[
(BoxForm`wasProtected = Unprotect[#1];
(* Uninteresting Which block removed *);

Protect[Evaluate[BoxForm`wasProtected]]) &,
{{IconizedObject, _}},
{1}
];
DumpGet[System`Private`$SystemFileDir <>
System`Dump`fixfile["NotebookTools`Iconize`"] <> "x"];
]

Running this seems to do nothing interesting so I'm wondering why it exists and in what way there are "Timestamps" in the call.



Answer




It is an internal and undocumented function that can be used to prevent reevaluation of expressions whenever particular symbols contained in them change. This is a simple example:


Clear[a, b];
b = 1 + a

(* 1 + a *)

Internal`WithTimestampsPreserved[{a}, a = 1];
{a, b}

(* {1, 1 + a} *)


Although the value of a changed, the evaluator did not think that b might need reevaluation.


That is because we preserved the timestamp of a, i.e. forced it to remain the same.


Contrast with the normal behavior where updating a also changed its timestamp, so now b is out of date and must be reevaluated.


a = 1; {a, b}

(* {1, 2} *)

In some sense, it accomplishes the opposite of Update, which can be used to force reevaluation in certain situations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.