Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - How to convert a system of parametric equations to a normal equation?


For example, I have a system of parametric equations (R is a constant number) :


{ x == p +  R Cos[k],
y == Cos[p] + R Sin[k],
k == ArcTan[ 1/Sin[p] ] }

Now I am going to find the normal equation of $\; y = f(x)\;$ without other variables. (Theoretically it is possible because there are totally 4 variables and 3 equations.)



How can I do this in Mathematica?



Answer



First, for the sake of simplicity let's define eqs - the system of our interest :


eqs = { x == p + R Cos[k],
y == Cos[p] + R Sin[k],
k == ArcTan[ 1/Sin[p]] };

Equations y = y(x)


For this system we can find an explicit equation $\;y = y(x)\;$ only assuming R == 0, otherwise we could find only implicit solutions.


Solve[ eqs /. R -> 0, y, {p}, MaxExtraConditions -> All]



{{y -> ConditionalExpression[Cos[x], k == ArcTan[Csc[x]]]}}

See e.g. Inverse function theorem for the general issue of invertibility, let's restrict to :


eqs[[1]] /. (Rule @@@ eqs)[[3]]


x == p + R/Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2]


When R is given, one could invert $\;x = x(p)\;$ in a neighbourhood of $p_{0}$ to get $\;p = p(x)\;$ if $\frac{dx}{dp}|_{p=p_{0}} \neq 0$, i.e. only for special ranges of p where $\frac{dx}{dp}$ doesn't vanish. While it would work well on the symbolic level using InverseFunction, but generically there is no way to get explicit formulae. We can animate dependence of the function $\;x = x(p)\;$ : p + R Cos[ArcTan[1/Sin[p]]] and its inverse function $\;p = p(x)\;$ on the running parameter -1 < R < 1 (then $x(p)$ is globally invertible). We add the symmetry axis p == x.


Animate[ Plot[ { p + R Cos[ArcTan[1/Sin[p]]],
p,
InverseFunction[ # + R Cos[ ArcTan[ 1/Sin[#]]] &]@p }, {p, -Pi, Pi},

PlotPoints -> 80, PlotRange -> {-3.3, 3.3},
PlotStyle -> {Thick, Dashed, Thick}],
{R, -1, 1} ]

enter image description here



Equations y = y(k)


We can get an equation for y in an implicit form using Eliminate and then solve the equation with respect to y :


Eliminate[ eqs, {x, p}, InverseFunctions -> True]
Reduce[%, y]


(-1 + y^2 - 2 R y Sin[k] + R^2 Sin[k]^2) Tan[k]^2 == -1

Tan[k] != 0 &&
(y == Cot[k]^2 (R Sin[k] Tan[k]^2 - Sqrt[-Tan[k]^2 + Tan[k]^4]) ||

y == Cot[k]^2 (R Sin[k] Tan[k]^2 + Sqrt[-Tan[k]^2 + Tan[k]^4]) )

We've got solutions in terms of k only. This is the best one can do for your system,
otherwise to get an equation for y in terms of x we should invert $\;k = k(x)\;$ to get $\;y = y(x)\;$


First @ Solve[ k == ArcTan[ Csc[ p]], p]


{p -> ArcCsc[Tan[k]]}

We could do that analogically as in the case $\;p = p(x)\;$, i.e using InverseFunction.



Equations y = y(p)


You could as well try another way of eliminating variables while solving equations (as pointed out by Searke) i.e. Solve[ eqns, vars, elims], and using MaxExtraConditions -> All to get also non-generic solutions, here we eliminate k to get a solution in terms of p :


Solve[ eqs, y, k, MaxExtraConditions -> All]


{{y -> ConditionalExpression[(R Csc[p] + Cos[p] Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2])/ Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2], 
Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2] != 0 &&
p - x + R/Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2] == 0]}}

The second argument in ConditionalExpression is the condition which has to be satisfied.



Nevertheless you could do the following to express y in terms of p and x :


Solve[ eqs, {y, k}]


{{y -> -Sqrt[-p^2 + R^2 + 2 p x - x^2] + Cos[p], k -> ArcTan[Csc[p]]},
{y -> Sqrt[-p^2 + R^2 + 2 p x - x^2] + Cos[p], k -> ArcTan[Csc[p]]}}

or


 Reduce[eqs, y, Backsubstitution -> True]



x == (R + p Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2])/Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2] && k == ArcTan[Csc[p]] && 
y == (R Csc[p] + Cos[p] Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2])/Sqrt[1 + Csc[p]^2]

There is another approach to get x in terms of y and p :


Eliminate[eqs, {x, k}, InverseFunctions -> True] //
Simplify[#, x == p + R Cos[k]] &

Reduce[%, x]



R^2 + 2 y Cos[p] == (p - x)^2 + y^2 + Cos[p]^2

x == p - Sqrt[R^2 - y^2 + 2 y Cos[p] - Cos[p]^2] ||
x == p + Sqrt[R^2 - y^2 + 2 y Cos[p] - Cos[p]^2]

Above, in all cases we have to use ReplaceAll (i.e. /.) and InverseFunction wherever appear p or k to get $\;p = p(x)\;$ or $\;k = k(x)\;$.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...