Skip to main content

graphics - Consistent Plot Styles across multiple MMA files and data sets


I am starting to write a thesis for which I want to use MMA for all my plotting needs, mostly because a lot of the basic analysis has been done there. To ensure that I am applying styles consistently (plot colors, image size, label size, etc.), I need a method which I can use across multiple files.


There are several types of plots that I will need:



  1. ListPlot / Plot

  2. ListDensityPlot / DensityPlot

  3. ListContourPlot / ContourPlot



I can think of several way of doing this:



  1. Define my own functions thPlot, thListPlot, etc which have my default styles applied

  2. Define my own style options into a variable, and use some combination of FilterRules and Options to make sure that options from that variable are applied to the right type of plot

  3. Set default options using Default for the different types of plots.


I am assuming that each of my datasets (which may have one or more plots) will be self-contained mathematica files that I can re-run. So, if I decide to change the style in some central location (via one of the methods above) I can re-run the MMA files and get the plots in the new style.


What have people done in the past?



Answer



For an example of plot option customization that I am still rather proud of please see:

How to change the default ColorData used in Mathematica's Plot?


For general customization I think you already outlined some good options. I personally favor the custom function method for maximum control. Another, perhaps cleaner method that I crudely copy from Leonid works well if you can pool options for all plot types in one list ($myoptions):


Update: changed withOptions to use the "injector pattern" so as not to disrupt functions if withOptions is used indiscriminately (withOptions[ 1 + 1 ]).


$myoptions = {Filling -> {1 -> {{2}, {Red, Purple}}}};

SetAttributes[withOptions, HoldFirst]

withOptions[head_Symbol[body__]] :=
FilterRules[$myoptions, Options[head]] /. {opts___} :> head[body, opts]


withOptions @ Plot[{Sin @ Log @ x, Cos[3 x]}, {x, 0, Pi}]

Mathematica graphics




Here I posted another method in answer to specifying plot ranges, but the method is very general and can be used for any options or parameters. It works by creating an UpValue assignment for the symbol given that applies to any head. This could of course be further restricted to apply to only one head or a list of heads. One could also include FilterRules as shown in the code above, depending on the effect desired. For example:


SetAttributes[setOpts, HoldAllComplete]

Quiet[
setOpts[s_Symbol, pat_: _, spec__?OptionQ] :=
s /: (h : pat)[pre__, s, post___] :=

FilterRules[{spec}, Options[h]] /. {opts___} :> h[pre, opts, post],
Optional::"opdef"
]

Now a single option as used above is assigned to op1:


setOpts[op1, Filling -> {1 -> {{2}, {Red, Purple}}}]

And used in Plot:


 Plot[{Sin @ Log @ x, Cos[3 x]}, {x, 0, Pi}, op1]


Mathematica graphics


Alternatively the options can be restricted to a particular head or head pattern. Here a different set of options, also named op1, is defined only for ParametricPlot:


setOpts[op1, ParametricPlot, Frame -> True, PlotStyle -> Thick, Axes -> None, 
MeshShading -> {Red, Blue}, Mesh -> 15]

ParametricPlot[{{2 Cos[t], 2 Sin[t]}, {2 Cos[t], Sin[t]}}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, op1]

enter image description here


Using op1 in Plot will still produce the result shown earlier.


You could also use Alternatives in the pattern, e.g: Plot | ListPlot | Histogram or more complication patterns with conditions, etc.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?