Skip to main content

graphics - Consistent Plot Styles across multiple MMA files and data sets


I am starting to write a thesis for which I want to use MMA for all my plotting needs, mostly because a lot of the basic analysis has been done there. To ensure that I am applying styles consistently (plot colors, image size, label size, etc.), I need a method which I can use across multiple files.


There are several types of plots that I will need:



  1. ListPlot / Plot

  2. ListDensityPlot / DensityPlot

  3. ListContourPlot / ContourPlot



I can think of several way of doing this:



  1. Define my own functions thPlot, thListPlot, etc which have my default styles applied

  2. Define my own style options into a variable, and use some combination of FilterRules and Options to make sure that options from that variable are applied to the right type of plot

  3. Set default options using Default for the different types of plots.


I am assuming that each of my datasets (which may have one or more plots) will be self-contained mathematica files that I can re-run. So, if I decide to change the style in some central location (via one of the methods above) I can re-run the MMA files and get the plots in the new style.


What have people done in the past?



Answer



For an example of plot option customization that I am still rather proud of please see:

How to change the default ColorData used in Mathematica's Plot?


For general customization I think you already outlined some good options. I personally favor the custom function method for maximum control. Another, perhaps cleaner method that I crudely copy from Leonid works well if you can pool options for all plot types in one list ($myoptions):


Update: changed withOptions to use the "injector pattern" so as not to disrupt functions if withOptions is used indiscriminately (withOptions[ 1 + 1 ]).


$myoptions = {Filling -> {1 -> {{2}, {Red, Purple}}}};

SetAttributes[withOptions, HoldFirst]

withOptions[head_Symbol[body__]] :=
FilterRules[$myoptions, Options[head]] /. {opts___} :> head[body, opts]


withOptions @ Plot[{Sin @ Log @ x, Cos[3 x]}, {x, 0, Pi}]

Mathematica graphics




Here I posted another method in answer to specifying plot ranges, but the method is very general and can be used for any options or parameters. It works by creating an UpValue assignment for the symbol given that applies to any head. This could of course be further restricted to apply to only one head or a list of heads. One could also include FilterRules as shown in the code above, depending on the effect desired. For example:


SetAttributes[setOpts, HoldAllComplete]

Quiet[
setOpts[s_Symbol, pat_: _, spec__?OptionQ] :=
s /: (h : pat)[pre__, s, post___] :=

FilterRules[{spec}, Options[h]] /. {opts___} :> h[pre, opts, post],
Optional::"opdef"
]

Now a single option as used above is assigned to op1:


setOpts[op1, Filling -> {1 -> {{2}, {Red, Purple}}}]

And used in Plot:


 Plot[{Sin @ Log @ x, Cos[3 x]}, {x, 0, Pi}, op1]


Mathematica graphics


Alternatively the options can be restricted to a particular head or head pattern. Here a different set of options, also named op1, is defined only for ParametricPlot:


setOpts[op1, ParametricPlot, Frame -> True, PlotStyle -> Thick, Axes -> None, 
MeshShading -> {Red, Blue}, Mesh -> 15]

ParametricPlot[{{2 Cos[t], 2 Sin[t]}, {2 Cos[t], Sin[t]}}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, op1]

enter image description here


Using op1 in Plot will still produce the result shown earlier.


You could also use Alternatives in the pattern, e.g: Plot | ListPlot | Histogram or more complication patterns with conditions, etc.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.