Skip to main content

plotting - LayeredGraphPlot Vertex Spacing / Edge Length


For anyone who has used LayeredGraphPlot (Mma v9), you have probably seen that the vertex spacing is consistent throughout, that vertices have the same minimum unit of spacing in the vertical and horizontal directions.


I know that changing AspectRatio will adjust one of the directions with respect to the other, but if I want to keep the existing aspect ratio, but want to space the vertices further apart (not resizing the overall graphic).


Without specifying the actual vertex potions using VertexCoordinateRules for each vertex, is it possible to change the vertical/horizontal spacing unit? For instance, if I just want all of the vertices to be spaced twice as far apart from each other in each direction as the default, can this be set?


UPDATE: For a given set a vertices LayeredGraphPLot chooses this minimum spacing unit, however, if you change the list of rules, or use a different set of rules (and hence how the vertices are connected), it will redraw it with different spacing, even though it could have been done using the spacing from the original set of rules, regardless of if you leave AspectRatio and ImageSize as free parameters or not. There may be an algorithm to avoid vertex crowding, but I don't see why the minimum unit spacing couldn't still be set anyway.


Here is an example, note that all of the red lines are the same size, depicting the constant unit dimension between vertices.


enter image description here


UPDATE 2: SquareOne's solution with two different data sets:


set1 = {"A" -> "B", "B" -> "C", "D" -> "F", "A" -> "F", "G" -> "B", "H" -> "C", "C" -> "G"};


enter image description here



set2 = {"B" -> "A", "B" -> "G", "D" -> "H", "A" -> "F", "G" -> "A", "H" -> "B", "F" -> "G"};


enter image description here


You can see, that with the same number of rules in the list (and hence the same number of edges), the same number of vertices, with the vertices being the same size (resizing the images), and the aspect ratios allowed to vary as needed to accommodate the plot, the edgelengths are very different.


UPDATE 3: SquareOne's solution has been modified to work for arbitrary datasets, I therefore accept his solution.



Answer



This answer is closely related to your previous post and to the answer I gave you then. They could actually be merged.


Edit


As requested, here is a new version of the function which let you change the scale of the edges while keeping the same unit length for any working set.


(I finally managed (not trivial) to get the width and height of the plot produced by the function LayeredGraphPlot ; these are needed in order to scale properly every elements in the rendering options);


As a bonus ;) the image size of the plots are now automatically scaled according to the unit length. Any other words you don't need anymore to resize manually the plots for different sets in order to compare them.



draw[set_, edgescale_: 1, aspectratio_: 0] :=
Module[{width, height, ar0, ar, thicknessDisk = 0.18},
{width, height} =
edgescale*(LayeredGraphPlot[set, Bottom, Axes -> False,
PlotRangePadding -> None][[1, 1, 1]] // Transpose // (Max@# - Min@#) & /@ # &);
ar0 = height/width;
ar = If[aspectratio == 0, ar0, aspectratio];
LayeredGraphPlot[set, Bottom, VertexLabeling -> True, DirectedEdges -> True,
EdgeRenderingFunction -> ({Black, Thickness[0.1/width], Arrow[#1, 0.05]} &),
VertexRenderingFunction -> ({EdgeForm[{Black, Thickness[0.04/width]}], White,

Disk[#1, Scaled[{thicknessDisk/width, ar0*thicknessDisk/height/ar}]],
Black, Style[Text[#2, #1], FontFamily -> "Arial", Bold,
FontSize -> Scaled[0.2/width]]} &),
PlotStyle -> Arrowheads[{{0.3/width, 0.8}}],
PlotRangePadding -> 0., Axes -> False, AspectRatio -> ar,
ImageSize -> 75*(width + 2*thicknessDisk)]]

Tests:


The example sets :


set1 = {"A" -> "B", "B" -> "C", "D" -> "F", "A" -> "F", "G" -> "B", "H" -> "C", "C" -> "G"}; 

set2 = {"B" -> "A", "B" -> "G", "D" -> "H", "A" -> "F", "G" -> "A", "H" -> "B", "F" -> "G"};

then put all this in one cell and run :


Print["set1 with edge scale = 2:"]; draw[set1, 2]
Print["set1 with edge scale = 1 and aspect ratio = 1:"]; draw[set1, 1, 1]
Print["set1 (default param.):"]; draw[set1]
Print["set2 (default param.):"]; draw[set2]

enter image description here


enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...