Skip to main content

dynamic - Soft-Match String Comparison


I have a list of names in which I would like to check for duplicates. However, within the list, the duplicates may not show up as exact duplicates of each other - for instance,


{Barack Obama, Barack H. Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, Obama Barack Hussein}


are all considered likely candidates to be duplicates of each other. Furthermore, the data may contain slight mistakes - for instance, the following and other variants would be considered (near) duplicates too.


{Barack Obama, barack Obama, Barrack Obama}


What I would like to do is to automatically highlight these duplicates (for example, by changing their font size or color as displayed on screen) so that I can later go through the list manually and confirm whether or not the duplicates are indeed duplicates.


My current approach is as such:


nlsplit = 
StringSplit /@ namelist; (*splitting the names at the whitespace*)

nlsplitsort =
Map[Sort, nlsplit,
2] ; (*sorting the names of each person alphabetically - for
example, John Anderson Doe becomes {Anderson, Doe, John}*)
nlsplitsortpad = Transpose[Map[PadRight[#, 5] &, nlsplitsort, 2]][[1]];
(*pad each person's name with zeros so that Mathematica doesn't sort
based on list length but on name*)
Sort[nlsplitsortpad]

This question may be linked to mine, but I feel it's sufficiently different to merit a post. Mr Wizard also informed me that a question of Soft-Match String Comparison may have been asked before and the link is here as Sjoerd C. de Vries points out.



Edit: It would be great if the following could be done, but from my knowledge of Mathematica, I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort.



  1. The process of highlighting duplicates does not change the ordering of the original list, but simply highlights them, and

  2. I could simply hover over a duplicate candidate where using Tooltip we display the possible matches identified as similar to this duplicate candidate.

  3. By choosing from a list of options I could do one of the following:

    • select the current duplicate candidate as the entry I want to keep (and remove all other similar candidates from the main list)

    • skip to one of the other matches displayed by the Tooltip and choose that as the entry I want to keep (removing all other similar candidates from the main list)

    • confirm that the current candidate is not in fact a duplicate, and remove it from the list of any candidate of duplicates.






Answer



Start by making some similarity measure of sentences, here I use one that takes number of words in common divided by number of words in longest sentence.


The measure is then used to connect sentences that are similar enough in a graph and extracts the connected components:


strs = {"Barack Obama", "Barack H. Obama", "Barack Hussein Obama", 
"Obama Barack Hussein", "Barrack Obma", "Some other", "Strings",
"That are not duplicates","NotReally Barrack Obama"};
sameWordQ[w1_, w2_] := EditDistance[w1, w2, IgnoreCase->True] < 2;
similarity[str1_, str2_] := Module[{

l1 = StringSplit[str1],
l2 = StringSplit[str2]},
Length@Intersection[l1, l2,SameTest->sameWordQ]/Max[Length[l1], Length[l2]]
]
findDupes[lst_] := ConnectedComponents@Graph@Flatten@MapIndexed[
Function[{str, ind},
Thread[str \[UndirectedEdge] Select[lst[[First@ind ;;]], similarity[str, #] >= 2/3 &]]
], lst]



findDupes[strs]
(* {{"Barack Obama", "Barack H. Obama", "Barack Hussein Obama",
"Obama Barack Hussein", "Barrack Obma", "NotReally Barrack Obama"},
{"Some other"}, {"Strings"}, {"That are not duplicates"}} *)

To actually answer the question and visually verify the output and remove false positives:


For each group returned take away all groups of length 1. Then for each name create a button that lets you remove a name if it is considered a false positive.


Options[verifyDupes] = {HoldFirst};
(* When you click save the result is stored in the first argument *)
verifyDupes[result_Symbol, dupes_] :=

Module[{
groups = Select[dupes, Length@# > 1 &],
isDupe = Blue, notDupe = Black, styles},

(*Creata a list of same size where each element is marked a duplicate*)
styles = Map[isDupe &, groups, {2}];

Column@{
MapIndexed[Function[{str, ind},
Button[Dynamic[Style[str, styles[[Sequence @@ ind]]]],

(*Switch style when a name is clicked*)
styles[[Sequence @@ ind]] = If[styles[[Sequence @@ ind]] === isDupe, notDupe,isDupe],
Appearance -> None]], groups, {2}],
Button["Save",
(*Remove all names that have been deselected*)
result = MapIndexed[
If[styles[[Sequence @@ #2]] === isDupe, #1, Unevaluated@Sequence[]] &,
groups, {2}]]}
]


strs = {"Barack Obama", "Barack H. Obama", "Barack Hussein Obama",
"Obama Barack Hussein", "barrack obma", "Some other", "Strings",
"That are not duplicates", "NotReally Barack Obama",
"John Anderson Doe", "John A. Doe", "John Doe"};

Clear@result
verifyDupes[result,findDupes[strs]]

nodupe


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....