Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Integrate Squared Legendre Polynomial


With the same purpose as this question, I wish to evaluate an integral that contains the squared Legendre Polynomials.


$\int_{-1}^{1}\left[P_n(x)\right]^2dx=\frac{2}{2n+1}$


I tried evaluating with no success: Assuming[{$n$$\in$Integers,n$\geq$0},$\int_{-1}^{1}$LegendreP[n,x]$^2$dx]


Assuming[{Element[n, Integers], n >= 0}, 
Integrate[LegendreP[n, x]^2, {x, -1, 1}]]

It seems odd that Mathematica wouldn't natively consider doing this, because Wolfram has specified the relationship on mathworld.wolfram.com - See Eqn(28).


I am not familiar with the backend processes of Mathematica, however I would expect a check to be performed when integrating with Legendre Polynomials.


Why is this not the case, and is there any alternative for an algebraic solution?



Edit: Example


An example of where this may be used is in solving an ODE that is a Sturm-Liouville System, and is very close in relation to the Legendre DE:


$([1-x^2]u')' + \mu \rho(x) u = f(x)$


Both when $\mu=\lambda_n$ and $\mu\neq\lambda_n$ for some n, the solution for u(x) will involve series coefficients $\gamma_n$: $\gamma_n = \frac{\int_{-1}^{1}f(x) u_n(x)dx}{\int_{-1}^{1}\rho(x)u_n(x)^2dx}$


Here for the Legendre SL system we know there are eigenfunctions $u_n = $ LegendreP[n,x]. The evaluation I considered will be used in the denominator when calculating such series coefficients.



Answer



Generate a sequence using Table then use FindSequenceFunction to find the general form


f[n_] = FindSequenceFunction[
Table[Integrate[LegendreP[n, x]^2, {x, -1, 1}], {n, 10}], n]


(* 2/(1 + 2 n) *)

Checking outside the original range


f[n] == Integrate[
LegendreP[n, x]^2, {x, -1, 1}] /. {{n -> 20}, {n -> 50}}

(* {True, True} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...