Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Using Inequality Assumptions


I'm having getting Mathematica to use my inequality assumptions. Here's a simple example:


$Assumptions = (v-w*x+y*z)>0
FullSimplify[Sign[(v-w*x+y*z)]]

Output: Sign[v-wx+yz] (Meaning that the assumption had no effect)


However, if I put in the pieces separately, it gives me the expected results.


$Assumptions = (v-w*x)>0
FullSimplify[Sign[(v-w*x)]]


Output: 1


$Assumptions = (y*z)>0
FullSimplify[Sign[(y*z)]]

Output: 1



Answer



The number of variables in the nonlinear expression in your first example (5) exceeds the limit set by the system sub-option "AssumptionsMaxNonlinearVariables" (which is 4).


SystemOptions["SimplificationOptions"]



{"SimplificationOptions" -> {"AssumptionsMaxNonlinearVariables" -> 4, "AssumptionsMaxVariables" -> 21, "AutosimplifyTrigs" -> True, "AutosimplifyTwoArgumentLog" -> True, "FiniteSumMaxTerms" -> 30, "FunctionExpandMaxSteps" -> 15, "ListableFirst" -> True, "RestartELProver" -> False, "SimplifyMaxExponents" -> 100, "SimplifyToPiecewise" -> True}}



Set the value of "AssumptionsMaxNonlinearVariables" to a larger number (say, 5) to make FullSimplify handle a larger number of nonlinear variables:


SetSystemOptions["SimplificationOptions" -> {"AssumptionsMaxNonlinearVariables" -> 5}];

$Assumptions = (v - w*x + y*z) > 0;
FullSimplify[Sign[(v - w*x + y*z)]]


1




Reset the value to its default using


SetSystemOptions["SimplificationOptions" -> {"AssumptionsMaxNonlinearVariables" -> 4}];

See also: Simplifying expressions with head Max


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more