Skip to main content

graphics - Visualisation of the field of algebraic numbers in the complex plane



Hot to plot the field of algebraic numbers in the complex plane?


enter image description here



In this picture, the color of a point indicates the degree of the polynomial of which it’s a root:


red = rational numbers


green = roots of quadratic polynomials,


blue = roots of cubic polynomials


yellow = roots of quartic polynomials, and so on



I tried first few steps:



data = Table[(-b + Sqrt[b^2 - 4 a c])/(2 a), {a, 1, 100}, {b, -100, 100}, {c, -100, 100}];

ListPlot[{Re[#], Im[#]} & /@ data, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0},
PlotStyle -> [Green, PointSize[.02]]]

but it doesn't work..


Thank you in advance to any one who may be able to give me some ideas



Answer



Your code works fine, but it's missing half the roots, and a Flattening of the list of numbers prior to applying Re and Im helps. Adding those in:


data = Flatten[

Table[{(-b + Sqrt[b^2 - 4 a c])/(2 a), (-b -
Sqrt[b^2 - 4 a c])/(2 a)}, {a, 1, 20}, {b, -20, 20}, {c, -20,
20}]];
ListPlot[{Re[#], Im[#]} & /@ data, PlotRange -> {{-3, 3}, {-3, 3}},
AspectRatio -> 1]

gets you this:


enter image description here


Which is pretty nice!


If you'd like to generate images more like the one in the Wiki article or my examples, you can do the following steps:





  1. Generate a list of complex roots of polynomials of some order N, where the vector of polynomial coefficients $\mathbf{v}=(a_0,\ldots,a_N)$ satisfies $|\mathbf{v}|\leq R$ for some cutoff radius $R$.




  2. Convert each root into a 2d coordinate by taking the real and imaginary parts.




  3. Create a sparse array, and increment the element at each root's coordinate by $\frac{1}{|\mathbf{v}|^2}$. That way, roots of simple polynomials (ie, polynomials whose coefficient vectors lie near the origin in $\mathbb{R}^{N+1}$) are "brightest", and roots of complicated polynomials (ie, polynomials whose coefficient vectors lie near the surface of the hypersphere) are dimmer. You'll need to translate, scale, and round the coordinates to be positive integers, as matrix indices must be positive integers.





  4. Blur the sparse array. The raw sparse array isn't pretty, and blurring will reveal make it obvious which points are bright, and which are dim. Using the built-in GaussianFilter is the quickest way, but it's not the best-looking. My preferred way is to FFT-convolve with a Lorentz-like distribution $\left(\frac{\gamma^2}{\gamma^2+x^2+y^2}\right)^\alpha$, where $\alpha$ determines the tail heaviness; $\alpha=1.15$ works pretty good.




  5. Colorize the resulting array $M$ and render it using Image. One easy way is to feed Image the tensor-product $M\otimes\mathbf{c}$ where $\mathbf{c}$ is some 3-element RGB vector. In Mathematica 10, TensorProduct preserves PackedArrays, whereas in older versions it doesn't, so beware of RAM consumption if you're using an older version and want large images. Incidentally, that link has some examples of algebraic number plots.




Here's an example you can get from the above:


enter image description here


IIRC the green points are $N=3$ (cubics), and the yellow ones are $N=2$ (quadratics).



Similar with just quartics (I added additional red lighting for points near the origin):


enter image description here


And a large image of monic cubics where the linear coefficient is restricted to be an 8th root of unity:


https://www.flickr.com/photos/104348204@N05/11637086656/sizes/o/


Example Code


Here's some code to do the above:


https://www.dropbox.com/s/ushalt5feb19wal/Root%20Generator.nb?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/wo4405fb73yrxgp/Root%20Visualizer.nb?dl=0


The "Root Generator" generates roots, converts them into a sparse array, and exports it to a file (steps 1-3). The "Root Visualizer" imports the files, and renders them (steps 4-5). It's got decent comments/instructions inside, but you may need to tweak the parameters to get what you want.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...