Skip to main content

front end - How to catch the "Preemptive" evaluations from within the main loop?


When trying to make an optimized version of my plotRange function I faced a problem of catching the "Preemptive" evaluations generated by the FrontEnd from withing the main evaluation loop.


Consider the following:


ClearAll["Global`*"]
xr[r__] := (xRange = {r}; None);
yr[r__] := (yRange = {r}; None);
nb = CreateDocument[{Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 6 Pi}, Ticks -> {xr, yr}]}];
{xRange, yRange}
Pause[1];
{xRange, yRange}

NotebookClose[nb]


{xRange, yRange}


{{-0.392699, 19.2423}, {-1.04167, 1.04167}}



One can see that the first evaluation of {xRange, yRange} returns undefined symbols because at the moment of its evaluation the functions xr and yr are still not evaluated via a "Preemptive" link by the FrontEnd. But after waiting one second these functions are already evaluated and xRange, yRange are defined. Because I need these values for further evaluations I need to delay the main loop until the "Preemptive" evaluations will be done. (An alternative solution would be to force the FrontEnd to perform its evaluations in the main loop.)


One possible way to solve the problem is to initiate a Dialog which will wait for the Return generated by the FrontEnd. But "Preemptive" evaluations go past the Dialog and do not allow the return from it (the following code freezes the kernel):


Dialog[xr[r__] := (xRange = {r}; None);
yr[r__] := (yRange = {r}; None; NotebookClose[nb];

Return[{xRange, yRange}]);
nb = CreateDocument[{Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 6 Pi},
Ticks -> {xr, yr}]}];]

Is it possible to catch the "Preemptive" evaluations from the main loop in some way?


UPDATE


Here is a comparison of my original Rasterize-based version and the new FinishDynamic-based:


gr = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 6 Pi}];
plotRange[plot : (_Graphics | _Graphics3D)] :=
Quiet@Last@

Last@Reap[
Rasterize[
Show[plot, PlotRangePadding -> None, Axes -> True,
Ticks -> (Sow[{##}] &), DisplayFunction -> Identity],
ImageResolution -> 1]]
Table[plotRange[gr], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming

plotRange[plot : (_Graphics | _Graphics3D)] :=
Quiet@Last@
Last@Reap[(nb =

CreateDocument[{Show[plot, Axes -> True,
Ticks -> (Sow[{##}] &), PlotRangePadding -> None,
DisplayFunction -> Identity]}, ShowCellBracket -> False,
WindowFrame -> "Frameless", WindowElements -> {},
WindowSize -> 1, Antialiasing -> False, Editable -> False,
Magnification -> 1, Saveable -> False,
WindowClickSelect -> False, WindowFloating -> False,
WindowFrameElements -> {}, WindowMovable -> False,
WindowSelected -> False, WindowTitle -> ""];
FinishDynamic[]; NotebookClose[nb])]

Table[plotRange[gr], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming


{2.828125, Null}


{8.406250, Null}



The original Rasterize-based version is 3 times faster.



Answer



After the dynamic evaluation (in this case, your plot) has been displayed to the screen but before you wish to access the variables, evaluate:


FinishDynamic[];


Note that this function isn't selective. It will force every Dynamic in the entire system to update before it continues.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....