Skip to main content

programming - How to correct my code for solving the Josephus problem?


Problem Description


Recently, I have been reading the book Schaum's Outline of Mathematica (2nd Edition), where I encountered the problem:




Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian of the first century. He wrote about a group of ten Jews in a cave who, rather than surrender to the Romans, chose to commit suicide, one by one. They formed a circle and every other one was killed. Who was the lone survivor?



The author's solution:


list = Range[10];
While[Length[list] > 1, list = Rest[RotateLeft[list]]];
list


{5}




However, I know it is not efficient to use the procedural methods such as Do, While, etc. Rather, I want to use a functional method like NestWhile, Nest, or FixedPoint to solve the problem.


My solutions:


Method 1:


list = Range @ 10; 
NestList[Rest @ RotateLeft[#] &, list, 9]


 {{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, 
{3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1},

{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1, 3},
{7, 8, 9, 10, 1, 3, 5},
{9, 10, 1, 3, 5, 7},
{1, 3, 5, 7, 9},
{5, 7, 9, 1},
{9, 1, 5},
{5, 9},
{5}}

Furthermore, this method has the flaw that I must give the number of iterations. In fact, sometimes that is unknown.



Method 2:


list = Range @10;
FixedPoint[If[Length@# != 1 &, Rest @ RotateLeft[#] &], list]

Unfortunately, method 2 doesn't work.


Method 3:


 list = Range @ 10;
NestWhileList[Rest @ RotateLeft[#] &, list, Length@list != 1]



{{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}}

So my question is: what is a good way to do it?



Answer



NestWhile[Rest @ RotateLeft @ # &, Range @ 10, Length @ # > 1 &]


{5}



FixedPoint[If[Length @ # > 1, Rest @ RotateLeft[#], #] &, Range @ 10]


Edit


Historical note: As far as I can remember, Josephus roulette (a plain treason to his companions) consisted of killing every third person.


FixedPoint[If[Length@# != 1, Rest@RotateLeft[#, 2], #] &, Range@10]


{4}



Note: The direction is important. RotateRight[] will select another victim.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...