Skip to main content

list manipulation - Populate an upper triangular matrix from a vector of elements


What is the best way to populate an upper triangular (or alternatively: lower triangular or symmetric) matrix from a vector of elements?


This example input:


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

should give


{{0, 1, 2, 3},

{0, 0, 4, 5},
{0, 0, 0, 6},
{0, 0, 0, 0}}

or alternatively


{{0, 1, 2, 3}, 
{1, 0, 4, 5},
{2, 4, 0, 6},
{3, 5, 6, 0}}


or even


{{0, 0, 0, 0},
{1, 0, 0, 0},
{2, 3, 0, 0},
{4, 5, 6, 0}}

This problem has many solutions of course. I'm looking for the best (criteria: most elegant/readable, shortest, fastest) ones.


The input has length $\binom{n}{2} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. Consider $n$ known. Feel free to use any version 10 functionality.



Answer



Here is a semi-imperative function to create an upper-triangular array:



upperTriangular[v_] := upperTriangular[v, (1 + Sqrt[1 + 8*Length@v])/2]

upperTriangular[v_, n_] := Module[{i = 0}, Array[If[# >= #2, 0, v[[++i]]]&, {n, n}]]

The function is expressed using two definitions for a reason that will become clear in a moment. Here it is in action:


upperTriangular @ Range @ 6

(* {{0,1,2,3},{0,0,4,5},{0,0,0,6},{0,0,0,0}} *)

If we know the square matrix size n ahead of time, and we intend to perform many such triangularizations, then it might be useful to precompile the transformation function. The following function does that, using the two-argument form of upperTriangular to write the matrix construction code:



upperTriangulizer[n_Integer, type_:_Integer] :=
Module[{v, r}
, Quiet[With[{r = upperTriangular[v, n]}, Compile[{{v, type, 1}}, r]], Part::partd]
]

Edit see the note below if this expression produces a warning


Here it is in action:


upperTriangulizer[5] @ Range[10]

(* {{0,1,2,3,4},{0,0,5,6,7},{0,0,0,8,9},{0,0,0,0,10},{0,0,0,0,0}} *)



The result is a packed array:


Developer`PackedArrayQ @ %

(* True *)

We can control the data type of the matrix elements:


upperTriangulizer[4, _Real] @ Range[6]

(* {{0.,1.,2.,3.},{0.,0.,4.,5.},{0.,0.,0.,6.},{0.,0.,0.,0.}} *)


An interesting feature of the generated function is that it involves no loops -- the resultant matrix is created by direct construction. The loops have been completely unrolled, a desirable situation for some applications:


CompiledFunctionTools`CompilePrint@upperTriangulizer[3, _Real]

(*
1 argument
4 Integer registers
9 Real registers
2 Tensor registers
Underflow checking off
Overflow checking off

Integer overflow checking on
RuntimeAttributes -> {}

T(R1)0 = A1
I0 = 0
I2 = 2
I1 = 1
I3 = 3
Result = T(R2)1


1 R0 = Part[ T(R1)0, I1]
2 R1 = Part[ T(R1)0, I2]
3 R2 = Part[ T(R1)0, I3]
4 R3 = I0
5 R4 = I0
6 R5 = I0
7 R6 = I0
8 R7 = I0
9 R8 = I0
10 T(R2)1 = {{R3, R0, R1}, {R4, R5, R2}, {R6, R7, R8}}

11 Return
*)



Note about the warning Optional::opdef


Mathematica versions 9 and earlier issue a warning when the compiled version of upperTriangulizer is defined:



Optional::opdef: "The default value for the optional argument type_:_Integer contains a pattern."



This message is defensive in nature, warning that the construction type_:_Integer is unusual. So unusual, in fact, it is frequently more likely to be a typing error rather than intentional. But in this case, the construction is intentional. We are defining a function that expects a type pattern as an argument, and we are assigning _Integer as the default pattern.



For whatever reason, version 10 no longer issues this warning message. Perhaps WRI is finding such constructions to be more common now? In any event, the message is safe to suppress on earlier versions:


Quiet[
upperTriangulizer[n_Integer, type_:_Integer] :=
Module[{v, r}
, Quiet[With[{r = upperTriangular[v, n]}, Compile[{{v, type, 1}}, r]], Part::partd]
]
, Optional::opdef
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...