Skip to main content

output formatting - Any way to make my equations look better, more Latex like?


I find that the equations I write in Mathematica are not always publication quality. Here is a typical example:


in-cell equation from a notebook


If I copy as Latex, then I get the following code:


\frac{\sum _{i=1}^N \frac{(k|k) \tilde{x}_j^i}{\sqrt{P_{\text{jj}} (k|k)}}}{N}

This code is actually kind of messed up and does not reproduce the equation correctly, but it is easy to manually edit it to create the right Latex code:


\frac{1}{N}{\sum _{i=1}^N \frac{ \tilde{x}_j^i(k|k)}{\sqrt{P_{\text{jj}} (k|k)}}}


Now, if we render this Latex code we get a much nicer looking version of the same equation:


Latex version of the same equation


The sigma looks better, variables are italicized, the vertical line (not sure what it is called) looks much better. The runt vertical line in Mathematica just looks really bad. Also, the coloring is removed, which for my purposes is better because I am including the equation in black and white text and do not want randomly colored symbols.


My question is: how can I make the equation look better in the notebook? For example, if I am using Mathematica to make a slide show or presentation, I want the equation to look as professional as possible, but still be an editable cell. What are my options?


Note that using TraditionalForm has the following consequences:


TraditionForm of Summation


Update


If we really torture it with both Defer and HoldForm, looks like we can get the typeset equation:


Typeset equation using TraditionalForm and HoldForm and Defer



Answer




Typesetting in Text cells


Cell[TextData[Cell[BoxData[
FormBox[
RowBox[{
FractionBox["1", "N"],
RowBox[{
UnderoverscriptBox["\[Sum]",
RowBox[{"i", "=", "1"}], "N"],
FractionBox[
RowBox[{

SubsuperscriptBox[
OverscriptBox["x","~"],
"j", "i"],
"(",
RowBox[{"k", "|", "k"}], ")"}],
SqrtBox[
RowBox[{
SubscriptBox["P", "jj"], "(",
RowBox[{"k", "|", "k"}], ")"}]]]}]}],
TraditionalForm]]]], "Text",

UnderoverscriptBoxOptions->{LimitsPositioning->False},
OverscriptBoxOptions->{DiacriticalPositioning->True},
FractionBoxOptions->{AllowScriptLevelChange->False}]

gives


enter image description here


This was typeset in a text cell by starting with Ctrl-9 and then typing


enter image description here


The default ScriptLevel for inline cells is 1 so I set that to 0 in a private style (Format > Edit Stylesheet):


enter image description here



The additional UnderoverscriptBox, OverscriptBox and FractionBox options were set via the option inspector. You can do additional tweeking by nudging terms around via Insert > Typesetting.


Typesetting in Input cells


Wrapping TraditionalForm around your expression, as per your updated question, is intended to render the output as traditional form. However your question seems to be framed around having traditional looking equations that -- based on your update -- can be evaluated.


If you want all you input and output to appear like this then set this globally in your preferences:


enter image description here


Then in your input cells you can type the equation and it will appear in traditional form:


enter image description here


If you only want to convert certain cells then either make the changes via the menu Cell > Convert To or via a right click:


enter image description here


which produces:



enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...