Skip to main content

equation solving - Find Root doesn't work properly


I use a FindRoot that doesn't find the right solution in some range, the FindRoot is the following:


tabexp = ParallelTable[{Temp,V /.FindRoot[Ifix - Isis[V/2, 0.2, Temp, 1.5, 1.4, \[Gamma]0, \[Gamma]0,RSISIS], {V, 4.05 d0Al[1.5]/q, 1. d0Al[1.5]/q,4.1 d0Al[1.5]/q}, AccuracyGoal -> 25,  PrecisionGoal -> 25,MaxIterations -> 2000]}, {Temp, 0.2, 1.25, 0.9/40}];

This is the plot of the FindRoot output tabexp:


enter image description here


The point is that the graphical solution is easy:


Plot[Evaluate[Table[{Ifix -Isis[V/2 d0Al[1.5]/q, 0.2, Tx, 1.5, 1.4,[Gamma]0, \[Gamma]0,RSISIS]}, {Tx, 0.6, 0.8, 0.05}]], {V, 1 , 4.3},PlotRange -> All]


enter image description here


I don't understand why it's not working properly. If you need all the code it is the following:


q = 1.602176487` 10^-19;
kB = 1.3806504` 10^-23;
\[HBar] = 1.054571628251774` 10^-34;
TcAluminio = 1.55;
d0Al[TcAl_] := 1.764 kB TcAl;
d0max = 1.764 kB 1.65;
delta[T_] := Tanh[1.74 Sqrt[1/T - 1]];
\[CapitalDelta]Al[T_, TcAl_] := delta[T/TcAl] d0Al[TcAl];


ngammaAl[energy_, T_, gamma_, TcAl_] :=
Abs[Re[(energy + I gamma d0Al[TcAl])/
Sqrt[(energy + I gamma d0Al[TcAl])^2 - \[CapitalDelta]Al[T,
TcAl]^2]]];
Isis[V_, T1_, T2_, TcAlP_, TcAlI_, gamma1_, gamma2_, Rjunction_] :=
Re[1/( q Rjunction)
NIntegrate[
ngammaAl[energy - q V, T1, gamma1, TcAlP] ngammaAl[energy, T2,
gamma2,

TcAlI] (1/(Exp[(energy - q V)/(kB T1)] + 1) - 1/(
Exp[energy/(kB T2)] +
1)), {energy, -10 d0max, -\[CapitalDelta]Al[T1,
TcAlP], \[CapitalDelta]Al[T2, TcAlI], \[CapitalDelta]Al[T2,
TcAlI], \[CapitalDelta]Al[T1, TcAlP], 10 d0max},
MinRecursion -> 4,
Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 100000,
"SymbolicProcessing" -> 0, "SingularityHandler" -> None},
PrecisionGoal -> 5]];
\[Gamma]0 = 10^-3;

RSISIS = 55000;
Ifix = Isis[0.0006/2, 1.1, 1.1, 1.5, 1.4, \[Gamma]0, \[Gamma]0,
RSISIS]

Thanks in advance and sorry for the bad English.



Answer



V_?NumericQ removes some errors. WorkingPrecision -> 32 removes others. NDSolve tracks the solution.


ClearAll[Isis];
Isis[V_?NumericQ, T1_, T2_, TcAlP_, TcAlI_,
gamma1_, gamma2_, Rjunction_] := Re[1/(q Rjunction) NIntegrate[

SetPrecision[
ngammaAl[energy - q V, T1, gamma1, TcAlP] ngammaAl[energy, T2,
gamma2, TcAlI] (1/(Exp[(energy - q V)/(kB T1)] + 1) -
1/(Exp[energy/(kB T2)] + 1)),
50], {energy, -10 d0max, -ΔAl[T1, TcAlP], ΔAl[T2, TcAlI], ΔAl[T2,
TcAlI], ΔAl[T1, TcAlP], 10 d0max},
MinRecursion -> 4,
Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 100000,
"SymbolicProcessing" -> 0, "SingularityHandler" -> None},
PrecisionGoal -> 5, WorkingPrecision -> 32]];


sol = NDSolve[{Ifix ==
Isis[V[Temp]/2, 0.2, Temp, 1.5, 1.4, γ0, γ0,
RSISIS], x'[Temp] == 1, x[0.2] == 0.2,
V[0.2] == (VV /.
FindRoot[
Ifix - Isis[VV/2, 0.2, 0.2, 1.5, 1.4, γ0, γ0,
RSISIS], {VV, 4.05 d0Al[1.5]/q, 3. d0Al[1.5]/q,
4.1 d0Al[1.5]/q}])},
V,

{Temp, 0.2, 1.25}]

ListLinePlot[V /. First@sol]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...