Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Replacing gamma at half integers by double factorial


It is well-known that for any positive integer $n$ the equality $\Gamma(n+\frac12)=\sqrt\pi\,(2n-1)!!/2^n$ holds, where $!!$ stands for the double factorial. I am using FullSimplify[expr,Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers] on certain expression expr, and the output contains $\Gamma(-\frac12+n)/\sqrt\pi$.


My question is: how can I instruct Mathematica to perform the simplification "$\Gamma(n+\frac12)=\sqrt\pi\,(2n-1)!!/2^n$ whenever $n$ is a positive integer" ? Of course, I want an answer no limited to this specific situation.


Edit: What I want is to "add" the simplification rule above to the list of simplifications included in FullSimplify, not merely "replace" the "string" $\Gamma(\cdots)$ by $\cdots !!/\cdots$.



Answer



You could use a function to do this expansion for you:


ClearAll[gammaExpand]
gammaExpand[e_] := e /. (Gamma[n_ + 1/2 /; FullSimplify[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0]] :>
Sqrt[Ï€] (2 n - 1)!!/2^n)


The FullSimplify in the definition takes care of picking up any assumptions placed in surrounding Assumptions blocks or assignments to $Assumptions.


expr = Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]];

This doesn't expand (as it should):


gammaExpand@expr


Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]]



This does:



Assuming[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0, gammaExpand@expr]


Sin[Log[2^-n Sqrt[Ï€] (-1 + 2 n)!!]]





It would be nice if you could build this rule into FullSimplify itself. It has the option TransformationFunctions for that. However, there is a reason that this doesn't work:


FullSimplify[expr, 
Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers && n > 0,
TransformationFunctions -> {Automatic, gammaExpand}

]


Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]]



The reason is that the resulting expression is simply more complex than the original, so FullSimplify doesn't have an incentive to perform this step. In fact, whenever it sees anything like the expanded form it will try to reduce it:


FullSimplify[2^-n Sqrt[Ï€] (-1 + 2 n)!!,
Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers && n > 0]



Gamma[1/2 + n]



You could try to come up with a modified version of the default ComplexityFunction but that would probably be too much hassle for this simple goal. Easier would be to forbid the reducing transformation using ExcludedForms:


Assuming[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0, 
FullSimplify[expr // gammaExpand,
ExcludedForms -> {Sqrt[Ï€] (2 n_ - 1)!!/2^n_}
]
]



Sin[Log[2^-n Sqrt[[Pi]] (-1 + 2 n)!!]]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...