Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Replacing gamma at half integers by double factorial


It is well-known that for any positive integer $n$ the equality $\Gamma(n+\frac12)=\sqrt\pi\,(2n-1)!!/2^n$ holds, where $!!$ stands for the double factorial. I am using FullSimplify[expr,Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers] on certain expression expr, and the output contains $\Gamma(-\frac12+n)/\sqrt\pi$.


My question is: how can I instruct Mathematica to perform the simplification "$\Gamma(n+\frac12)=\sqrt\pi\,(2n-1)!!/2^n$ whenever $n$ is a positive integer" ? Of course, I want an answer no limited to this specific situation.


Edit: What I want is to "add" the simplification rule above to the list of simplifications included in FullSimplify, not merely "replace" the "string" $\Gamma(\cdots)$ by $\cdots !!/\cdots$.



Answer



You could use a function to do this expansion for you:


ClearAll[gammaExpand]
gammaExpand[e_] := e /. (Gamma[n_ + 1/2 /; FullSimplify[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0]] :>
Sqrt[Ï€] (2 n - 1)!!/2^n)


The FullSimplify in the definition takes care of picking up any assumptions placed in surrounding Assumptions blocks or assignments to $Assumptions.


expr = Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]];

This doesn't expand (as it should):


gammaExpand@expr


Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]]



This does:



Assuming[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0, gammaExpand@expr]


Sin[Log[2^-n Sqrt[Ï€] (-1 + 2 n)!!]]





It would be nice if you could build this rule into FullSimplify itself. It has the option TransformationFunctions for that. However, there is a reason that this doesn't work:


FullSimplify[expr, 
Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers && n > 0,
TransformationFunctions -> {Automatic, gammaExpand}

]


Sin[Log[Gamma[1/2 + n]]]



The reason is that the resulting expression is simply more complex than the original, so FullSimplify doesn't have an incentive to perform this step. In fact, whenever it sees anything like the expanded form it will try to reduce it:


FullSimplify[2^-n Sqrt[Ï€] (-1 + 2 n)!!,
Assumptions -> n \[Element] Integers && n > 0]



Gamma[1/2 + n]



You could try to come up with a modified version of the default ComplexityFunction but that would probably be too much hassle for this simple goal. Easier would be to forbid the reducing transformation using ExcludedForms:


Assuming[n \[Element] Integers && n > 0, 
FullSimplify[expr // gammaExpand,
ExcludedForms -> {Sqrt[Ï€] (2 n_ - 1)!!/2^n_}
]
]



Sin[Log[2^-n Sqrt[[Pi]] (-1 + 2 n)!!]]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...