Skip to main content

pattern matching - Orderless and Sequence


I just ran into the following subtlety.


Let us consider a function f with attribute Orderless.


Attributes[f]={Orderless};

For pattern matching, the consequence of this attribute is that when we have an expression with head f, any ordering of the arguments is tested. That can be seen in the following result:



ReplaceList[ f[a,b,c], f[x_,y_, z_] :> {x,y,z} ]

(* {{a,b,c},{a,c,b},{b,a,c},{b,c,a},{c,a,b},{c,b,a}} *)

I would have expected the same result from the next command, where in the rule I catch the three arguments of f in a BlankSequence, thereby placing a Sequence expression in the list at the right hand side:


 ReplaceList[ f[a,b,c], f[x__] :> {x} ]

(* {{a,b,c}} *)

It only gives one result! Likely, I overlooked something simple, but I fail to see a good explanation. Why does this not work?




Answer



Here is how I make sense of this behavior. When a function that appears in a pattern has attribute Orderless, the pattern-matcher must generate all possible permutations of its argument sequence before trying to match these patterns.


Refer to a simple example expression such as a /. b -> c: in a nutshell, as Fred mentioned in his comment below, I contend that the attribute Orderless causes the system to generate possible alternatives for the b expression, rather than for a.


When the argument sequence of your orderless f function contains more than one argument, then multiple permutations are generated. The specification f[x_, y_, z_] -> {x, y, z} in the second argument of ReplaceList can be thought of as equivalent to the following "expanded form":


{f[x_, y_, z_] -> {x, y, z}, f[x_, z_, y_] -> {x, y, z}, f[y_, x_, z_] -> {x, y, z}, 
f[y_, z_, x_] -> {x, y, z}, f[z_, x_, y_] -> {x, y, z}, f[z_, y_, x_] -> {x, y, z}}

Each one of those patterns matches f[a, b, c] in the first argument of ReplaceList, hence the multiple results.


However, when the pattern specified in the second argument of ReplaceList contains only one argument, then there are no permutations to account for, so only one "equivalent pattern" is considered, which matches once.





To clarify my point, here is a helper function that approximates my vision of what the pattern matcher is doing for orderless functions. Note that here we use a regular, non-orderless g function, and simulate orderless behavior explicitly.


Clear[generateOrderlessPatterns]
Attributes[g] = {};

generateOrderlessPatterns[functiontoapply_, list_, patterntype_] :=
Table[
functiontoapply[Sequence @@ (Pattern[#, patterntype] & /@ i)] -> list,
{i, Permutations[list]}
]


We can then generate "orderless-style" patterns for the non-orderless g function:


generateOrderlessPatterns[g, {x, y, z}, Blank[]]

(* Out:
{g[x_, y_, z_] -> {x, y, z}, g[x_, z_, y_] -> {x, y, z}, g[y_, x_, z_] -> {x, y, z},
g[y_, z_, x_] -> {x, y, z}, g[z_, x_, y_] -> {x, y, z}, g[z_, y_, x_] -> {x, y, z}}
*)

On the other hand, if we use a BlankSequence pattern, we obtain:


generateOrderlessPatterns[g, {x}, BlankSequence[]]


(* Out: {g[x__] -> {x}} *)

Using these patterns in ReplaceList emulates the Orderless behavior of f:


ReplaceList[g[a, b, c], generateOrderlessPatterns[g, {x, y, z}, Blank[]]]

(* Out:
{{a, b, c}, {a, c, b}, {b, a, c}, {c, a, b}, {b, c, a}, {c, b, a}}
*)


ReplaceList[g[a, b, c], generateOrderlessPatterns[g, {x}, BlankSequence[]]]

(* Out: {{a, b, c}} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...