Skip to main content

Threading over a list of lists of lists and a list of atomic expressions


Although I solved the following problem using MapThread, I'm curious about why Thread does not work as I expect it to here.


Given two lists of length n, where the first list is a list of lists of lists and the second is a list of atomic expressions, such as:


list1 = {{{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}}, {{1, 3, 5}, {9, 8}}};
list2 = {"a", "b"};

and where list1[[n]] can contain 1 or more lists of atomic expressions. I would like to create a single list that places the nth element of the second list at the end of every sublist of list1[[n]], producing:


{{{1, 2, "a"}, {3, 4, 5, "a"}}, {{1, 3, 5, "b"}, {9, 8, "b"}}}


I first tried the following


appendTo[ll_, item_] := Map[Append[#, item] &, ll];
Thread[appendTo[list1, list2]]

But this returns:


{{{1, 2}, {1, 3, 5}}, {{3, 4, 5}, {9, 8}}, {{"a", "b"}, {"a", "b"}}}

even though threading an undefined function seems to produce the right expressions:


Thread[f[a, b]]
{f[{{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}}, "a"], f[{{1, 3, 5}, {9, 8}}, "b"]}


MapThread works fine:


MapThread[appendTo, {list1, list2}]
{{{1, 2, "a"}, {3, 4, 5, "a"}}, {{1, 3, 5, "b"}, {9, 8, "b"}}}

So why is Thread producing the behavior shown above instead of giving the same result as MapThread?


Threading Rule on the same lists also produces what I expect:


Thread[Rule[list1, list2]]
{{{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}} -> "a", {{1, 3, 5}, {9, 8}} -> "b"}

Answer




The simple answer: Thread does not have the attribute HoldAll, so its contents are executed before it processes them.


But, it is not quite that simple. If you add HoldAll, you still don't get what you want


Internal`InheritedBlock[{Thread},
SetAttributes[Thread, HoldAll];
Thread[appendTo[list1, list2]]
]
(* {{{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}, {"a", "b"}}, {{1, 3, 5}, {9, 8}, {"a", "b"}}} *)

which implies that in this form only the first list is threaded over.





Note, I used Internal`InheritedBlock to retain the behavior of Thread while not allowing my modifications to leak.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.