Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to understand the usage of Inner and Outer figuratively?


Description:


In Mathematica the functions like Thread, Inner, Outer etc. are very important and are used frequently.


For the function Thread:


Thread Usage1:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}]]



{f[a], f[b], f[c]}

Thread Usage2:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}, x]]


{f[a, x], f[b, x], f[c, x]}

Thread Usage3:



Thread[f[{a, b, c}, {x, y, z}]]


{f[a, x], f[b, y], f[c, z]}

And I understand the Usage1, Usage2, Usage3 easily as well as I use them masterly.


However I always cannot master the usage of Inner and Outer so that I must refer to the Mathematica Documentation every time when I feel I need using them.


I find that I cannot master them owing to that I cannot understand the results of Inner and Outer clearly. Namely, I always forget what construct they generate when executed.


The typical usage cases of Inner and Outer shown as below:





Inner Usage:


Inner[f, {a, b}, {x, y}, g]


g[f[a, x], f[b, y]]

Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {x, y}, g]


{g[f[a, x], f[b, y]], g[f[c, x], f[d, y]]}


Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {{x, y}, {u, v}}, g]


{{g[f[a, x], f[b, u]], g[f[a, y], f[b, v]]}, 
{g[f[c, x], f[d, u]], g[f[c, y], f[d, v]]}}

Outer Usage:


Outer[f, {a, b}, {x, y, z}]



{{f[a, x], f[a, y], f[a, z]}, {f[b, x], f[b, y], f[b, z]}}

Outer[f, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}}, {{a, b}, {c, d}}]


{{{{f[1, a], f[1, b]}, {f[1, c], f[1, d]}}, 
{{f[2, a], f[2, b]}, {f[2, c], f[2, d]}}},
{{{f[3, a], f[3, b]}, {f[3, c], f[3, d]}},
{{f[4, a], f[4, b]}, {f[4, c], f[4, d]}}}}


Questions:




  1. How to master the usage Inner and Outer? Namely, how can I use them without referring to the Mathematica Documentation?




  2. How to understand the result of Out[3],Out[4],Out[5] figuratively? Namely, by using graphics or other way.






Answer



I think of Outer just like nikie showed.


Inner is a generalization of matrix multiplication. I like the picture from the Wikipedia page.


Matrix Multiplication


To calculate an entry of matrix multiplication, you first pair list entries (a11,b12) and (a12,b22). You "times/multiply" those pairs (a11*b12) and (a12*b22), and then you "plus/add" all the results (a11*b12)+(a12*b22). Note that you "times" before you "plus" in matrix multiplication which helps me remember the order of arguments for Inner.


listL={{a11,a12},{a21,a22},{a31,a32},{a41,a42}};
listR={{b11,b12,b13},{b21,b22,b23}};
Inner[times,listL,listR,plus]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

functions - What best practices or performance considerations are there for choosing between Cases, Position, Pick and Select?

Cases , Select , Pick and Position each have different syntaxes and purposes, but there are times when you can express the same calculation equivalently using either of them. So with this input: test = RandomInteger[{-25, 25}, {20, 2}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {-8, -19}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {-3, -25}, {21, -18}, {4, 4}, {2, -2}, {-24, 8}, {-17, -8}, {4, -18}, {22, -24}, {-4, -3}, {21, 0}, {19, 18}, {-23, -8}, {23, -25}, {14, -2}, {-1, -13}} You can get the following equivalent results: Cases[test, {_, _?Positive}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Select[test, #[[2]] > 0 &] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Pick[test, Sign[test[[All, 2]] ], 1] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} test[[Flatten@Position[test[[All, 2]], _?Positive] ]] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Are there performance or other considerations that should guide which you shou...