Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to understand the usage of Inner and Outer figuratively?


Description:


In Mathematica the functions like Thread, Inner, Outer etc. are very important and are used frequently.


For the function Thread:


Thread Usage1:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}]]



{f[a], f[b], f[c]}

Thread Usage2:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}, x]]


{f[a, x], f[b, x], f[c, x]}

Thread Usage3:



Thread[f[{a, b, c}, {x, y, z}]]


{f[a, x], f[b, y], f[c, z]}

And I understand the Usage1, Usage2, Usage3 easily as well as I use them masterly.


However I always cannot master the usage of Inner and Outer so that I must refer to the Mathematica Documentation every time when I feel I need using them.


I find that I cannot master them owing to that I cannot understand the results of Inner and Outer clearly. Namely, I always forget what construct they generate when executed.


The typical usage cases of Inner and Outer shown as below:




Inner Usage:


Inner[f, {a, b}, {x, y}, g]


g[f[a, x], f[b, y]]

Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {x, y}, g]


{g[f[a, x], f[b, y]], g[f[c, x], f[d, y]]}


Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {{x, y}, {u, v}}, g]


{{g[f[a, x], f[b, u]], g[f[a, y], f[b, v]]}, 
 {g[f[c, x], f[d, u]], g[f[c, y], f[d, v]]}}

Outer Usage:


Outer[f, {a, b}, {x, y, z}]



{{f[a, x], f[a, y], f[a, z]}, {f[b, x], f[b, y], f[b, z]}}

Outer[f, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}}, {{a, b}, {c, d}}]


{{{{f[1, a], f[1, b]}, {f[1, c], f[1, d]}}, 
  {{f[2, a], f[2, b]}, {f[2, c], f[2, d]}}}, 
 {{{f[3, a], f[3, b]}, {f[3, c], f[3, d]}}, 
  {{f[4, a], f[4, b]}, {f[4, c], f[4, d]}}}}


Questions:




  1. How to master the usage Inner and Outer? Namely, how can I use them without referring to the Mathematica Documentation?




  2. How to understand the result of Out[3],Out[4],Out[5] figuratively? Namely, by using graphics or other way.






Answer



I think of Outer just like nikie showed.


Inner is a generalization of matrix multiplication. I like the picture from the Wikipedia page.


Matrix Multiplication


To calculate an entry of matrix multiplication, you first pair list entries (a11,b12) and (a12,b22). You "times/multiply" those pairs (a11*b12) and (a12*b22), and then you "plus/add" all the results (a11*b12)+(a12*b22). Note that you "times" before you "plus" in matrix multiplication which helps me remember the order of arguments for Inner.


listL={{a11,a12},{a21,a22},{a31,a32},{a41,a42}};
listR={{b11,b12,b13},{b21,b22,b23}};
Inner[times,listL,listR,plus]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more