Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to understand the usage of Inner and Outer figuratively?


Description:


In Mathematica the functions like Thread, Inner, Outer etc. are very important and are used frequently.


For the function Thread:


Thread Usage1:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}]]



{f[a], f[b], f[c]}

Thread Usage2:


Thread[f[{a, b, c}, x]]


{f[a, x], f[b, x], f[c, x]}

Thread Usage3:



Thread[f[{a, b, c}, {x, y, z}]]


{f[a, x], f[b, y], f[c, z]}

And I understand the Usage1, Usage2, Usage3 easily as well as I use them masterly.


However I always cannot master the usage of Inner and Outer so that I must refer to the Mathematica Documentation every time when I feel I need using them.


I find that I cannot master them owing to that I cannot understand the results of Inner and Outer clearly. Namely, I always forget what construct they generate when executed.


The typical usage cases of Inner and Outer shown as below:




Inner Usage:


Inner[f, {a, b}, {x, y}, g]


g[f[a, x], f[b, y]]

Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {x, y}, g]


{g[f[a, x], f[b, y]], g[f[c, x], f[d, y]]}


Inner[f, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {{x, y}, {u, v}}, g]


{{g[f[a, x], f[b, u]], g[f[a, y], f[b, v]]}, 
 {g[f[c, x], f[d, u]], g[f[c, y], f[d, v]]}}

Outer Usage:


Outer[f, {a, b}, {x, y, z}]



{{f[a, x], f[a, y], f[a, z]}, {f[b, x], f[b, y], f[b, z]}}

Outer[f, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}}, {{a, b}, {c, d}}]


{{{{f[1, a], f[1, b]}, {f[1, c], f[1, d]}}, 
  {{f[2, a], f[2, b]}, {f[2, c], f[2, d]}}}, 
 {{{f[3, a], f[3, b]}, {f[3, c], f[3, d]}}, 
  {{f[4, a], f[4, b]}, {f[4, c], f[4, d]}}}}


Questions:




  1. How to master the usage Inner and Outer? Namely, how can I use them without referring to the Mathematica Documentation?




  2. How to understand the result of Out[3],Out[4],Out[5] figuratively? Namely, by using graphics or other way.






Answer



I think of Outer just like nikie showed.


Inner is a generalization of matrix multiplication. I like the picture from the Wikipedia page.


Matrix Multiplication


To calculate an entry of matrix multiplication, you first pair list entries (a11,b12) and (a12,b22). You "times/multiply" those pairs (a11*b12) and (a12*b22), and then you "plus/add" all the results (a11*b12)+(a12*b22). Note that you "times" before you "plus" in matrix multiplication which helps me remember the order of arguments for Inner.


listL={{a11,a12},{a21,a22},{a31,a32},{a41,a42}};
listR={{b11,b12,b13},{b21,b22,b23}};
Inner[times,listL,listR,plus]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more