Skip to main content

parallelization - Mathematica Parellelization on HPC


I'm currently using Mathematica on a High Performance Cluster (HPC) which consists of many compute nodes each with around 16 cores. I currently run my Mathematica script on 20 of the nodes that invokes 10 cores and 10 of the subkernels licenses in Parallel, meaning I use 20 Mathkernel licenses and 200 subkernel licenses.


The problem is we have limited Mathkernel licenses (36, and for me to be using 20 of them is unfair on everyone else!) although ample subkernel licenses (288). Is there a way I can just use a single (or at least fewer) Mathkernel licenses to invoke the 200 subkernels I need?


Currently in each of the 20 scripts I just have


LaunchKernels[10];
ParellelTable[....];

which launches the 10 local subkernels on each node, but could I specify different nodes to launch subkernels on perhaps? Thereby I would only need to launch one Mathkernel which could invoke the 200 subkernels spread across the compute nodes.




Answer



What you need to launch subkernels across several nodes on a HPC cluster is the following:



  1. Figure out how to request several compute nodes for the same job

  2. Find the names of the nodes that have been allocated for your job

  3. Find out how to launch subkernels on these nodes from within the main kernel


All of these depend on the grid engine your cluster is using, as well as your local setup, and you'll need to check its docs and ask your administrator about the details. I have an example for our local setup (complete with a jobfile), which might be helpful for you to study:


https://bitbucket.org/szhorvat/crc/src


Our cluster uses the Sun Grid Engine. The names of the nodes (and information about them) are listed in a "hostfile" which you can find by retrieving the value of the PE_HOSTFILE environment variable. (I think this works the same way with PBS, except the environment variable is called something else.)



Note that if you request multiple nodes in a single job file, the job script will be run on only one of the nodes, and you'll be launching the processes across all nodes manually (at least on SGE and PBS).


Launching processes on different nodes is usually possible with ssh: just run ssh nodename command to run command. You may also need to set up passphraseless authentication if it is not set up by default. To launch subkernels, you'll need to pass the -f option to ssh to let it return immediately after it has launched the remote process.


Some setups use rsh instead of ssh. To launch a command in the background using rsh, you'll need to do


rsh -n nodename "command >& /dev/null &"

To run the remote process in the background, it important to redirect the output (both stdout and stderr) because there's a bug in rsh (also described in its man page) that won't let it return immediately otherwise.


Another thing to keep in mind about rsh is that you can't rsh to the local machine, so you'll need to launch the subkernels which will run on the same machine as the main kernel without rsh.


See my example for details.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more