Skip to main content

parallelization - Mathematica Parellelization on HPC


I'm currently using Mathematica on a High Performance Cluster (HPC) which consists of many compute nodes each with around 16 cores. I currently run my Mathematica script on 20 of the nodes that invokes 10 cores and 10 of the subkernels licenses in Parallel, meaning I use 20 Mathkernel licenses and 200 subkernel licenses.


The problem is we have limited Mathkernel licenses (36, and for me to be using 20 of them is unfair on everyone else!) although ample subkernel licenses (288). Is there a way I can just use a single (or at least fewer) Mathkernel licenses to invoke the 200 subkernels I need?


Currently in each of the 20 scripts I just have


LaunchKernels[10];
ParellelTable[....];

which launches the 10 local subkernels on each node, but could I specify different nodes to launch subkernels on perhaps? Thereby I would only need to launch one Mathkernel which could invoke the 200 subkernels spread across the compute nodes.




Answer



What you need to launch subkernels across several nodes on a HPC cluster is the following:



  1. Figure out how to request several compute nodes for the same job

  2. Find the names of the nodes that have been allocated for your job

  3. Find out how to launch subkernels on these nodes from within the main kernel


All of these depend on the grid engine your cluster is using, as well as your local setup, and you'll need to check its docs and ask your administrator about the details. I have an example for our local setup (complete with a jobfile), which might be helpful for you to study:


https://bitbucket.org/szhorvat/crc/src


Our cluster uses the Sun Grid Engine. The names of the nodes (and information about them) are listed in a "hostfile" which you can find by retrieving the value of the PE_HOSTFILE environment variable. (I think this works the same way with PBS, except the environment variable is called something else.)



Note that if you request multiple nodes in a single job file, the job script will be run on only one of the nodes, and you'll be launching the processes across all nodes manually (at least on SGE and PBS).


Launching processes on different nodes is usually possible with ssh: just run ssh nodename command to run command. You may also need to set up passphraseless authentication if it is not set up by default. To launch subkernels, you'll need to pass the -f option to ssh to let it return immediately after it has launched the remote process.


Some setups use rsh instead of ssh. To launch a command in the background using rsh, you'll need to do


rsh -n nodename "command >& /dev/null &"

To run the remote process in the background, it important to redirect the output (both stdout and stderr) because there's a bug in rsh (also described in its man page) that won't let it return immediately otherwise.


Another thing to keep in mind about rsh is that you can't rsh to the local machine, so you'll need to launch the subkernels which will run on the same machine as the main kernel without rsh.


See my example for details.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...