Skip to main content

output formatting - Style markers in strings


I'm dealing with strings in Mathematica and I would love to handle their stylling in the most cenvenient way.


Without loss of generality, let's assume I want to make some parts of string Bold.


Example of desired output:



to be or not to be



I know I can achieve that by for example:



StringForm["to `` or `` to be", ##] & @@ (Style[#, Bold]& /@ {"be", "not"}) 

but I want single function bold and some kind of markers (here #):


bold @ "to #be# or #not# to be"


to be or not to be





It is my approach:



bold = Module[{x}, 
With[{patt = "#" ~~ x : Except["#"] .. ~~ "#"},
StringForm @@ ({
StringReplace[#, patt :> "``"],
Sequence @@ StringCases[#, patt :> Style[x, Bold]]
})]
] &

and I have couple of questions about it:




  • do you feel that # is not the best choice too? :)

  • is this: {patt = "#"~~...} a proper way of storing patterns?

  • maybe some other ideas?


I like this way but I'm not sure if it is bulletproof. It is quite handy because StringCases etc do not look for overlaps by default.


Notice that mixed-style-string-form tends to produce some kind of error If you want to edit that cell. This is also what I to want to ask about:



INTERNAL SELF-TEST ERROR: MathEditCells2|c|1384
Click here to find out if this problem is known, and to help improve
Mathematica by reporting it to Wolfram Research



Answer



You can use # or any other marker for your personal use, but for general purposes, I prefer sticking to the Markdown scheme that we're all familiar with, and is used in several other places. With the styleMarkdown function defined later in this answer, we can do something like this:


styleMarkdown["The **quick** brown fox *jumps* over the ***lazy*** dog."]


Here's the code for the above function:


ClearAll@styleMarkdown
styleMarkdown[str_String] := Module[{style, applyRules},
style[s_String, {weight_ : Plain, slant_ : Plain}] := StringJoin[

"\!\(\*StyleBox[\"", s, "\", FontWeight -> ", ToString@weight,
", FontSlant -> " , ToString@slant, "]\)"];

applyRules[s_String, rules_] :=
StringReplace[s, # ~~ Shortest@x__ ~~ # :> style[x, #2] & @@@ rules];

applyRules[str, {"***" -> {Bold, Italic}, "**" -> {Bold}, "*" -> {Plain, Italic}}]
]

The function only handles bold, italic and bolditalic, but you can extend it to other styles, if you want. The limitations in markdown also apply here. For example, with ****foo****, is it to be interpreted as (markers in [] and styled text in <>) *[******]* or [***<*foo>***]* or *[******], and so on.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...