Skip to main content

finite element method - Numerically solving the Laplace equation in a 2d cylinder


Consider the following Laplace equation and boundary condition $$\begin{equation}\begin{cases} \Delta \theta(r,\phi)=0 \\ \int d \vec{\ell}\cdot\nabla \theta(r,\phi)=2\pi \end{cases} \end{equation}$$ where $\phi\in[0,2\pi)$, $r\in[0,\infty)$ and the integral is over a circular contour of constant $r$ around the origin such that $d\vec{\ell}=rd\phi \hat{\phi}$ with $\hat{\phi}$ a unit vector in direction $\phi$. The solution to this equation is simply $\theta(r,\phi)=\phi$.


I want to learn how to solve this equation numerically in Mathematica and (approximately) recreate the solution in Cartesian coordinates. To this end, I'm taking a cylindrical domain with an annulus to avoid problems at $r=0$. The outer radius is $R_{1}=1$ and the inner radius is $R_{0}=0.1$. The domain looks like this


enter image description here


Following Solve Laplace equation in Cylindrical - Polar Coordinates, I seem to get the correct solution in polar coordinates but not in Cartesian coordinates and I don't understand why.


Any help is appreciated.


In Polar coordinates I get


enter image description here


and in Cartesian coordinates I get


enter image description here



This is the code in polar coordinates


R1 = 1; R0 = 0.1;
regionCyl =
DiscretizeRegion[
RegionDifference[
ImplicitRegion[
0 <= r <= R1 && 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi], {r, \[Phi]}],
ImplicitRegion[
0 <= r <= R0 && 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi], {r, \[Phi]}]],
PrecisionGoal -> 6];

laplacianCil = Laplacian[\[Theta][r, \[Phi]], {r, \[Phi]}, "Polar"];
boundaryConditionCil = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][
r, \[Phi]] == \[Phi], {r == R0, 0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi]}],
DirichletCondition[\[Theta][r, \[Phi]] == \[Phi], {r == R1,
0 <= \[Phi] <= 2 \[Pi]}]};
solCyl = NDSolveValue[{laplacianCil == 0,
boundaryConditionCil}, \[Theta], {r, \[Phi]} \[Element] regionCyl,
MaxSteps -> Infinity];
potentialSquareRepresentation =
ContourPlot[

solCyl[r, \[Phi]], {r, \[Phi]} \[Element] solCyl["ElementMesh"],
ColorFunction -> "Temperature", Contours -> 20,
PlotLegends -> Automatic];
potentialCylindricalRepresentation =
Show[potentialSquareRepresentation /.
GraphicsComplex[array1_, rest___] :>
GraphicsComplex[(#[[1]] {Cos[#[[2]]], Sin[#[[2]]]}) & /@ array1,
rest], PlotRange -> Automatic]

and this is the code in Cartesian coordinates



R1 = 1; R0 = 0.1;
regionCyl =
DiscretizeRegion[
RegionDifference[ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R1, {x, y}],
ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R0, {x, y}]],
PrecisionGoal -> 7];
laplacian = Laplacian[\[Theta][x, y], {x, y}];
boundaryCondition = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] ==
ArcSin[y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]], {Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] == R0,
0 <= y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= 2 \[Pi]}],

DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] ==
ArcSin[y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]], {Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] == R1,
0 <= y/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= 2 \[Pi]}]};
sol = NDSolveValue[{laplacian == 0,
boundaryCondition}, \[Theta], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl,
MaxSteps -> Infinity];
DensityPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl,
ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic,
ImageSize -> Medium]

Answer




In Cartesian coordinates, the solution $\theta $ has a gap on the line $y=0$.To get a solution, you need to make a cut and define a solution on both sides of the cut, for example:


R1 = 1; y0 = 0.01;
regionCyl =
DiscretizeRegion[
RegionDifference[ImplicitRegion[Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] <= R1, {x, y}],
ImplicitRegion[-R1 <= x <= 0 && -y0 <= y <= y0, {x, y}]]];
laplacian = Laplacian[\[Theta][x, y], {x, y}];
boundaryCondition = {DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] ==
ArcTan[x, y], x^2 + y^2 == R1^2],
DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == Pi, y == y0],

DirichletCondition[\[Theta][x, y] == -Pi, y == -y0]};
sol = NDSolveValue[{laplacian == 0,
boundaryCondition}, \[Theta], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl,
Method -> {"FiniteElement",
"InterpolationOrder" -> {\[Theta] -> 2},
"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.0001}}];


{DensityPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl,
ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic,

ImageSize -> Medium],
ContourPlot[sol[x, y], {x, y} \[Element] regionCyl,
ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", PlotLegends -> Automatic,
ImageSize -> Medium, Contours -> 20]}

fig1


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.