Skip to main content

plotting - Building a Career Ladder Lattice (Follow up)


I want to thank you both for your help above. I'm going to abandon my quest for a number to label substitution using VertexRenderingFunction; because I need the labels to appear inside the yellow boxes as in:


LayeredGraphPlot[{"Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Construction Foreman", 
  "Construction Foreman" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Stonemason" -> "Construction Foreman", 
  "Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Bricklayer" -> "Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Stonemason", 

  "Bricklayer" -> "Stonemason", "Stonemason" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Apprentice Stonemason", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Apprentice Stonemason", 
  "Apprentice Stonemason" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Stonemason" -> "Stonemason", 
  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter", 

  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Stonemason"}, 
 VertexLabeling -> True, 
 VertexCoordinateRules -> {{3, 6}, {6, 9}, {6, 6}, {9, 6}, {3, 3}, {6,
     3}, {9, 3}, {6, 0}}]

The question now becomes; how can I get single double-arrows joining:


Tile & Marble Setter <---> Bricklayer;


Bricklayer <---> Stonemason;


Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter <---> Apprentice Bricklayer;



Apprentice Bricklayer <---> Apprentice Stonemason;


in the above LayeredGraphPlot?


Thanks again!



Answer



VertexCoordinateRules apply to elements in the absolute order given, so by leading with 2 in 2 -> 1 you need to give its coordinate first.


titles = {"Construction Foreman",
   "Tile & Marble Setter",
   "Bricklayer",
   "Stonemason",
   "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter",

   "Apprentice Bricklayer",
   "Apprentice Stonemason",
   "Helper/Finisher"};

LayeredGraphPlot[{2 -> 1, 3 -> 1, 4 -> 1, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 2 -> 4, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 3, 
  5 -> 2, 5 -> 6, 5 -> 7, 6 -> 5, 6 -> 3, 6 -> 7, 7 -> 6, 7 -> 4, 8 -> 5, 8 -> 6, 
  8 -> 7},
 VertexCoordinateRules ->
   {{3, 6}, {6, 9}, {6, 6}, {9, 6}, {3, 3}, {6, 3}, {9, 3}, {6, 0}}, 
 VertexRenderingFunction -> 

   (Text[Style[titles[[#2]], Background -> White] ~Rotate~ (-20 °), #] &)
]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more