Skip to main content

plotting - Building a Career Ladder Lattice (Follow up)


I want to thank you both for your help above. I'm going to abandon my quest for a number to label substitution using VertexRenderingFunction; because I need the labels to appear inside the yellow boxes as in:


LayeredGraphPlot[{"Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Construction Foreman", 
  "Construction Foreman" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Stonemason" -> "Construction Foreman", 
  "Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Bricklayer" -> "Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Stonemason", 

  "Bricklayer" -> "Stonemason", "Stonemason" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter" -> "Apprentice Stonemason", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Bricklayer" -> "Apprentice Stonemason", 
  "Apprentice Stonemason" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Apprentice Stonemason" -> "Stonemason", 
  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter", 

  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Bricklayer", 
  "Helper/Finisher" -> "Apprentice Stonemason"}, 
 VertexLabeling -> True, 
 VertexCoordinateRules -> {{3, 6}, {6, 9}, {6, 6}, {9, 6}, {3, 3}, {6,
     3}, {9, 3}, {6, 0}}]

The question now becomes; how can I get single double-arrows joining:


Tile & Marble Setter <---> Bricklayer;


Bricklayer <---> Stonemason;


Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter <---> Apprentice Bricklayer;



Apprentice Bricklayer <---> Apprentice Stonemason;


in the above LayeredGraphPlot?


Thanks again!



Answer



VertexCoordinateRules apply to elements in the absolute order given, so by leading with 2 in 2 -> 1 you need to give its coordinate first.


titles = {"Construction Foreman",
   "Tile & Marble Setter",
   "Bricklayer",
   "Stonemason",
   "Apprentice Tile & Marble Setter",

   "Apprentice Bricklayer",
   "Apprentice Stonemason",
   "Helper/Finisher"};

LayeredGraphPlot[{2 -> 1, 3 -> 1, 4 -> 1, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 2 -> 4, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 3, 
  5 -> 2, 5 -> 6, 5 -> 7, 6 -> 5, 6 -> 3, 6 -> 7, 7 -> 6, 7 -> 4, 8 -> 5, 8 -> 6, 
  8 -> 7},
 VertexCoordinateRules ->
   {{3, 6}, {6, 9}, {6, 6}, {9, 6}, {3, 3}, {6, 3}, {9, 3}, {6, 0}}, 
 VertexRenderingFunction -> 

   (Text[Style[titles[[#2]], Background -> White] ~Rotate~ (-20 °), #] &)
]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to remap graph properties?

Graph objects support both custom properties, which do not have special meanings, and standard properties, which may be used by some functions. When importing from formats such as GraphML, we usually get a result with custom properties. What is the simplest way to remap one property to another, e.g. to remap a custom property to a standard one so it can be used with various functions? Example: Let's get Zachary's karate club network with edge weights and vertex names from here: http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset_info?id=1&format=html g = Import[ "http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset?id=1&format=GraphML", {"ZIP", "karate.GraphML"}] I can remap "name" to VertexLabels and "weights" to EdgeWeight like this: sp[prop_][g_] := SetProperty[g, prop] g2 = g // sp[EdgeWeight -> (PropertyValue[{g, #}, "weight"] & /@ EdgeList[g])] // sp[VertexLabels -> (# -> PropertyValue[{g, #}, "name"]...
Post a Comment
Read more