Skip to main content

bugs - What is the syntax to conditionally suppress plotting in version 9?


Bug introduced in 9.0 and fixed in 9.0.1




In Mathematica 7 it is very easy to conditionally suppress plotting of individual lines using If:


Plot[{
  If[x^2 < 2, x^2],
  If[Exp[x] > x^2, Exp[x]],
  If[False, x]                (* check recommended by Rahul *)
 },
 {x, -2, 2},
 PlotStyle -> Thick, Frame -> True]


enter image description here


Or more verbosely using Piecewise and Indeterminate:


Plot[{
  Piecewise[{{x^2, x^2 < 2}}, Indeterminate],
  Piecewise[{{Exp[x], Exp[x] > x^2}}, Indeterminate],
  Piecewise[{{x, False}}, Indeterminate]      (* check recommended by Rahul *)
  },
 {x, -2, 2},
 PlotStyle -> Thick, Frame -> True]


enter image description here


It is reported that neither method works in version 9.0.0 (at least on OSX.) Furthermore it is reported that my attempt using ConditionalExpression also fails:


Plot[{
  ConditionalExpression[x^2, x^2 < 2],
  ConditionalExpression[Exp[x], Exp[x] > x^2]
  },
 {x, -2, 2},
 PlotStyle -> Thick, Frame -> True]

Plotting a zero is reported to "work" but that is hardly a solution:



Plot[{
  Piecewise[{{x^2, x^2 < 2}}],
  Piecewise[{{Exp[x], Exp[x] > x^2}}]
  },
 {x, -2, 2},
 PlotStyle -> Thick, Frame -> True]

enter image description here


1. Is this indeed a bug in version 9.0.0?


2. Is there a workaround for the affected systems?




Answer



Since this bug seems to be tied directly to the appearance of Indeterminate as the only available function value in the plot range, it could perhaps be considered a work-around to replace Indeterminate by another "quantity" that behaves the same way as Indeterminate but doesn't cause the whole display of all other functions to be suppressed.


I tried the following, and it works on version 9.0.0:


Plot[{Piecewise[{{x^2,x^2<2}},Indeterminate],
  Piecewise[{{Exp[x],Exp[x]>x^2}},Indeterminate],
  Piecewise[{{x,False}},I]      (*modified check recommended by Rahul*)},
 {x,-2,2},
 PlotStyle->Thick,Frame->True]

Here, I used the imaginary unit I to produce the same effect as Indeterminate, and the remaining plots do still get displayed.



To make this more general, maybe one can use a replacement rule like this:


Plot[Evaluate[{Piecewise[{{x^2, x^2 < 2}}, Indeterminate], 
    Piecewise[{{Exp[x], Exp[x] > x^2}}, Indeterminate], 
    Piecewise[{{x, False}}, 
     Indeterminate]      (*modified check recommended by Rahul*)} /. 
   Indeterminate -> I], {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> Thick, Frame -> True]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more