Skip to main content

gathering - How to organically merge nested associations?



Suppose I want to construct an association of associations, such as a list of people with attributes:


peopleFacts=<| alice-> <|age->29,shoeSize->7|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>

However, I want to grow and update this organically by adding facts as I learn them.


peopleFacts[["steve","hairColor"]] = "red";
peopleFacts[["bob","age"]] = "22";
peopleFacts[["steve","major"]] = "physics";

It's possible to accomplish this awkwardly by either (a) filling the database with blank entries or (b) laboriously checking at each level of association to see if an entry is blank before filling it in (except the last level, where AssociateTo helps you). But I think there must be a more elegant way. Here is what I've tried.


This method breaks because it tosses out the second key:



 In[]:= peopleFacts[["steve","hairColor"]] = "red";
        peopleFacts

Out[]:= <|steve -> red, alice-> <|age->29,shoeSize->7|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>

This method drops existing data:


 In[]:= peopleFacts

Out[]:= <| alice-> <|age->29,shoeSize->7|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>


 In[]:= AssociateTo[peopleFacts, alice-> <|"sport"->"baseball"|>;
        peopleFacts

Out[]:= <| alice-> <|sport->baseball|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>

This method just doesn't evaluate:


 In[]:= AssociateTo[peopleFacts[["chris"]], "favoriteFood" -> "sushi"]

Out[]:= AssociateTo[peopleFacts[["chris"]], "favoriteFood" -> "sushi"]


EDIT: Here is a way-too-awkward method adapted from this answer by SuTron.


 In[]:= peopleFacts

Out[]:= <| alice-> <|age->29,shoeSize->7|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>

 In[]:= Module[{temp = peopleFacts["alice"]},
          AssociateTo[temp, "sport"->"baseball"];
          AssociateTo[peopleFacts, "alice" -> temp];
        ];
        peopleFacts


Out[]:= <| alice-> <|age->29,shoeSize->7,sport->baseball|>, bob-> <|age->27,sex->male|> |>

It's not hard to imagine defining a custom update function like


  NestedAssociateTo[peopleFacts,{"steve","haircolor","red"}]

that would handle this all for you, but I'd much rather have a nice native Mathematica solution that is optimized, and that I don't have to maintain or worry about.



Answer



Initial data:


peopleFacts = <|

    alice -> <|age -> 29, shoeSize -> 7|>, 
    bob -> <|age -> 27, sex -> male,  hair -> <|Color -> RGBColor[1, 0, 0]|>
    |>
|>;


Here is a version of RecurAssocMerge reduced to a single definition.


MergeNested = If[MatchQ[#, {__Association}], Merge[#, #0], Last[#]] &

MergeNested @ {peopleFacts, <|bob -> <|hair -> <|length -> 120|>|>|>}



 <|
   alice -> <|
     age -> 29, 
     shoeSize -> 7|>, 
   bob -> <|
     age -> 27, 
     sex -> male,  
     hair -> <|Color -> RGBColor[1, 0, 0], length -> 120|>

   |>
 |>


Special case of 2-level deep association


Merge[{
   peopleFacts,
   <|bob -> <|hairColor -> 1|>|>
 },
 Association

]

"Tidy" approach to write NestedMerge:


RecurAssocMerge[a : {__Association}] := Merge[a, RecurAssocMerge];
RecurAssocMerge[a_] := Last[a];



  • adding key to deep level association:


    RecurAssocMerge[

      {peopleFacts, <|bob -> <|hair -> <|length -> 120|>|>|>}
     ]


     <|alice -> <|age -> 29, shoeSize -> 7|>, 
       bob -> <|age -> 27, sex -> male, hair -> <|
            Color -> RGBColor[1, 0, 0], length -> 120 |>
       |>
     |>




  • entirely new tree


    RecurAssocMerge[
       {peopleFacts, <|kuba -> <|hair -> <|length -> 120|>|>|>}
     ]


     <|
        alice -> <|age -> 29, shoeSize -> 7|>, 

        bob -> <|age -> 27, sex -> male, hair -> <|Color -> RGBColor[1, 0, 0]|>
        |>, 
        kuba -> <|hair -> <|length -> 120|>|>
    |>




Section added by Jess Riedel:


Specialize to single new entry



RecurAssocMerge defined above is a general method for merging nested Associations. We can define an abbreviation for the special case when we are adding only a single new entry.


RecurAssocMerge[ini_Association, path_List, value_] := RecurAssocMerge[{
   ini, Fold[<|#2 -> #|> &, value, Reverse@path]
}]

Then we can just do


RecurAssocMerge[peopleFacts, {bob, hair, length}, 120]


 <|alice -> <|age -> 29, shoeSize -> 7|>, 

   bob -> <|age -> 27, sex -> male, hair -> <|
            Color -> RGBColor[1, 0, 0], length -> 120 |>
     |>
   |>

Notes


If you want to modify peopleFacts the peopleFacts = Merge... is needed of course.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more