Skip to main content

bugs - How symbol lookup actually works


Bug introduced in V6 and fixed in V11.3



The behavior indeed changed but now the documentation is clear about it.





This code is inconsistent with the description from Power Programming with Mathematica:



x = 5;
temp`x = 6;
Begin["temp`"]
{x, Global`x, temp`x}

The result in my Mathematica session is {5, 5, 6}, but it's {6, 5, 6} in Section 8.1.1 of Power Programming with Mathematica (page 231 of the hardcopy or page 249 of the PDF).



Answer



This behaviour has changed since that book was published. I am writing this additional answer to make it clear how Mathematica 9 searches contexts for symbols and that even the current version 9 documentation is incorrect in describing this.


How symbol lookup actually works


When you enter a symbol name such as x, Mathematica will check if a symbol with this name already exists. It will first search the contexts from $ContextPath for x, one by one. If it doesn't find it there, it'll search the context from $Context for it. If it still doesn't find it, then it will create a new symbol named x in $Context.



Thus $ContextPath controls where to look for symbols, while $Context controls where to create new symbols.


Your observations are explained by these rules, noting that Begin will change $Context only but not $ContextPath. Note that BeginPackage will change both $Context and $ContextPath.


Warning: the documentation contains an error in Mathematica versions older than 11.3.


The $ContextPath documentation states that



$ContextPath is a global variable that gives a list of contexts, after $Context, to search in trying to find a symbol that has been entered.



In fact $ContextPath is searched before $Context in the current version.


In old versions this was not the case, as the Wagner book describes. I don't know when the change happened.


The Contexts tutorial does correctly state the order of search in the current version:




Since $Context is searched after $ContextPath, you can think of it as having "." appended to the file search path.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.