Skip to main content

programming - Forecast Future Stock Prices - Brownian Motion - Again



excuse me, I think I have here a technical problem with Mathematica yesterday I posted the question with the title: Forecast Future Stock Prices - Brownian Motion I am still not very experienced but when I copied your code and entered it, it worked perfectly. Today I reopened the Wolfram Finance Platform Quickstart Notebook, and tried to work further in a new notebook. Again it didn’t work. And when I opened the notebook with the code you sent me, and refreshed it, also the one that worked perfectly didn’t work anymore. Could it be that Mathenatica cannot distinguish between the two notebook, although they weren’t open at the same time? Or what could be the problem? Thank you for your help.


So the whole code is here:


BrownianMotion[period_, "steps_Integer:" 1000, "init_:" 0] := 
Accumulate[Prepend[RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, Sqrt[period⁄steps]], steps], init]]
ListLinePlot[BrownianMotion[1, 1000], AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Stochastic Brownian Motion", Bold]]

BrownianMotionPaths[period_, "steps_Integer:" 1000, paths_Integer,
init_List] /; (Length[init] == paths) ≔Transpose[
Accumulate[Prepend[

RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, Sqrt[period/steps]], {steps, paths}], init]]]
brownianPath =
ListLinePlot[BrownianMotionPaths[1, 1000, 50, ConstantArray[0.5, 50]],
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Stochastic Brownian Motion", Bold]]
GOOGExpRet = Mean[FinancialData["GOOG", "Return", DatePlus[-365], "Value"]]
GOOGPrice = FinancialData["GOOG"]
GOOGVol = FinancialData["GOOG", "Volatility50Day"]

ListLinePlot[

GOOGPrice*(1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, 251] + BrownianMotion[1, 250]*GOOGVol),
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Price", Bold]]
ListLinePlot[
GOOGPrice*(1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50, ConstantArray[0.5, 50]]*GOOGVol),
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", "St"},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Price", Bold],
ImageSize \[RightArrow] 400]
Mean[(GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +

BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol))[[All, -1]]];

GOOGBMPlot =
Block[{meanGOOGPrice =
Mean[(GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol))[[All, -1]]]}, "
" simulatedGOOGPaths =
ListLinePlot[
GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol), AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", S_t},

PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Prices\n(Brownian Motion)", Bold],
BaseStyle \[RightArrow] style, PlotRange \[RightArrow] {{0, 260}, {0, 1200}},
PlotStyle \[RightArrow] Directive[{Thin, Lighter@Gray}],
Epilog \[RightArrow] {{m8red[1], Point[{250, meanGOOGPrice}]},
Text[Style["Mean\n$" <> ToString[PaddedForm[meanGOOGPrice, {5, 2}]], m8red[1], Bold,
FontFamily \[RightArrow] "Verdana"], {215, meanGOOGPrice}], {m8red[1],
Line[{{245, meanGOOGPrice}, {255, meanGOOGPrice}}]}}]]

Hope you guys can help me. And one more question: how can I copy the mathematica code into a word file without having it in the formulae format? Thanks



Answer




Maybe this question will be closed again. Anyway I'll try to answer the question not correcting the original code, but using a new one with some basic explanations...


First of all, you can basically divide stocks in two big groups: growth stocks and value stocks. This is important, because the way you simulate growth stocks is completely different from that of value stocks. So let me start with growth stocks...




Growth stocks


Historical example: Microsoft from 1986 to 2000


DateListLogPlot[FinancialData["MSFT",{{1986},{2000}}],Joined->True]

enter image description here


Now consider a Geometric Brownian Motion with drift.


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.5, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here




Value stocks


Historical example: Microsoft from 2000 until 2012


DateListLogPlot[FinancialData["MSFT", {{2000}, {2012}}],Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Now consider a Geometric Brownian Motion without drift:


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.1, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here


So if you want to forecast future stock prices you have to keep in mind what kind of stock you're trying to forecast/simulate in order to use the right Geometric Brownian Motion: with or without drift.


EDITED


Now consider 1000 simulations for a growth stock (i.e., 1000 Geometric Brownian Motions with drift):


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.5, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1000}], Joined -> True]

enter image description here


And, finally, consider 1000 simulations for a value stock (i.e., 1000 Geometric Brownian Motions withouth drift):


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.1, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1000}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here


P.S.: please keep in mind that $\mu$ in the function GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[μ, σ, x0] represents exactly the drift of the process. If you set it too high, you get a process with drift. If you set it close to zero, you get a process without drift.


P.S.2: you can also compute historical volatility and use it as $\sigma$ in the function GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[μ, σ, x0].


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.