Skip to main content

programming - Forecast Future Stock Prices - Brownian Motion - Again



excuse me, I think I have here a technical problem with Mathematica yesterday I posted the question with the title: Forecast Future Stock Prices - Brownian Motion I am still not very experienced but when I copied your code and entered it, it worked perfectly. Today I reopened the Wolfram Finance Platform Quickstart Notebook, and tried to work further in a new notebook. Again it didn’t work. And when I opened the notebook with the code you sent me, and refreshed it, also the one that worked perfectly didn’t work anymore. Could it be that Mathenatica cannot distinguish between the two notebook, although they weren’t open at the same time? Or what could be the problem? Thank you for your help.


So the whole code is here:


BrownianMotion[period_, "steps_Integer:" 1000, "init_:" 0] := 
Accumulate[Prepend[RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, Sqrt[period⁄steps]], steps], init]]
ListLinePlot[BrownianMotion[1, 1000], AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Stochastic Brownian Motion", Bold]]

BrownianMotionPaths[period_, "steps_Integer:" 1000, paths_Integer,
init_List] /; (Length[init] == paths) ≔Transpose[
Accumulate[Prepend[

RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, Sqrt[period/steps]], {steps, paths}], init]]]
brownianPath =
ListLinePlot[BrownianMotionPaths[1, 1000, 50, ConstantArray[0.5, 50]],
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Stochastic Brownian Motion", Bold]]
GOOGExpRet = Mean[FinancialData["GOOG", "Return", DatePlus[-365], "Value"]]
GOOGPrice = FinancialData["GOOG"]
GOOGVol = FinancialData["GOOG", "Volatility50Day"]

ListLinePlot[

GOOGPrice*(1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, 251] + BrownianMotion[1, 250]*GOOGVol),
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", B_t},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Price", Bold]]
ListLinePlot[
GOOGPrice*(1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50, ConstantArray[0.5, 50]]*GOOGVol),
AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", "St"},
PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Price", Bold],
ImageSize \[RightArrow] 400]
Mean[(GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +

BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol))[[All, -1]]];

GOOGBMPlot =
Block[{meanGOOGPrice =
Mean[(GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol))[[All, -1]]]}, "
" simulatedGOOGPaths =
ListLinePlot[
GOOGPrice (1 + GOOGExpRetConstantArray[1, {50, 251}] +
BrownianMotionPaths[1, 250, 50] GOOGVol), AxesLabel \[RightArrow] {"Time", S_t},

PlotLabel \[RightArrow] Style["Simulated Google Prices\n(Brownian Motion)", Bold],
BaseStyle \[RightArrow] style, PlotRange \[RightArrow] {{0, 260}, {0, 1200}},
PlotStyle \[RightArrow] Directive[{Thin, Lighter@Gray}],
Epilog \[RightArrow] {{m8red[1], Point[{250, meanGOOGPrice}]},
Text[Style["Mean\n$" <> ToString[PaddedForm[meanGOOGPrice, {5, 2}]], m8red[1], Bold,
FontFamily \[RightArrow] "Verdana"], {215, meanGOOGPrice}], {m8red[1],
Line[{{245, meanGOOGPrice}, {255, meanGOOGPrice}}]}}]]

Hope you guys can help me. And one more question: how can I copy the mathematica code into a word file without having it in the formulae format? Thanks



Answer




Maybe this question will be closed again. Anyway I'll try to answer the question not correcting the original code, but using a new one with some basic explanations...


First of all, you can basically divide stocks in two big groups: growth stocks and value stocks. This is important, because the way you simulate growth stocks is completely different from that of value stocks. So let me start with growth stocks...




Growth stocks


Historical example: Microsoft from 1986 to 2000


DateListLogPlot[FinancialData["MSFT",{{1986},{2000}}],Joined->True]

enter image description here


Now consider a Geometric Brownian Motion with drift.


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.5, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here




Value stocks


Historical example: Microsoft from 2000 until 2012


DateListLogPlot[FinancialData["MSFT", {{2000}, {2012}}],Joined -> True]

enter image description here


Now consider a Geometric Brownian Motion without drift:


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.1, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here


So if you want to forecast future stock prices you have to keep in mind what kind of stock you're trying to forecast/simulate in order to use the right Geometric Brownian Motion: with or without drift.


EDITED


Now consider 1000 simulations for a growth stock (i.e., 1000 Geometric Brownian Motions with drift):


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.5, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1000}], Joined -> True]

enter image description here


And, finally, consider 1000 simulations for a value stock (i.e., 1000 Geometric Brownian Motions withouth drift):


ListLogPlot[Table[RandomFunction[GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[0.1, .4, 1], {0, 14, .003}]["Path"], {1000}], Joined -> True]


enter image description here


P.S.: please keep in mind that $\mu$ in the function GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[μ, σ, x0] represents exactly the drift of the process. If you set it too high, you get a process with drift. If you set it close to zero, you get a process without drift.


P.S.2: you can also compute historical volatility and use it as $\sigma$ in the function GeometricBrownianMotionProcess[μ, σ, x0].


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...