Skip to main content

list manipulation - Finding time-series direction reversal of certain magnitude


I'd like to find the points of a time-series that are a certain distance away (in value, not in time) from the previous maximum, which I consider a reversal.


For example, for {1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 8, 6, 3} with a threshold of 4, the reversal point would be 6, since it's 4 units away from the previous maximum of 10.


I want to find all such reversal points, but at each one I need to reset the running maximum (or split the list and start again on the new list).



Here is some code to find the first reversal. It computes the distance from each element to a rolling maximum, then looks for the first difference bigger than the threshold.


ts = {1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 8, 6, 3};
rollmax = FoldList[Max, First[ts], Rest[ts]];
delta = rollmax - ts;
sel = Map[# >= 4 &, delta];
index = Position[sel, True, 1, 1]

I can do this in a procedural way, but it's probably not the preferred way. I'm new to functional programming and I don't quite know what sort of patterns are available that would help me here.


And if there was a better way of writing the above code, please let me know.



Answer




You seem to be on the right track. If I understand your question I believe this will help:


f = If[#2 + 4 <= #, -∞, Max[##]] &;

FoldList[f, ts]

Position[%, -∞, {1}]

(See Shorter syntax for Fold and FoldList? regarding FoldList[f, ts].)


The above assumes that you want to reset the new maximum to the value after the reversal (3).
If you want to reset it to the reversal point value itself, try this:



f = If[#2 + 4 <= Max@#, {#2}, Max[##]] &;

FoldList[f, ts]

Position[%, {_}, {1}]



I argue the superiority of the FoldList method over Module/MapIndexed. The latter introduces a variable that it does not need to, it is longer, and it is slower.


SeedRandom[1]
ts = RandomInteger[20, 50000];


Timing[
r1 =
Module[{max = -∞},
MapIndexed[(max = Max[max, #1];
If[max - #1 >= 4, Sow[#2]; max = -∞;]) &, ts];] //
Reap // Last // Flatten;
]



{0.1966, Null}



f = If[#2 + 4 <= #, -∞, Max[##]] &;

Timing[
r2 = Join @@ Position[FoldList[f, #, {##2}] & @@ ts, -∞, 1];
]


{0.0874, Null}




r1 === r2


True



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.