Skip to main content

image processing - Generating animations of clouds with Mathematica



I'd like to generate some visually-pleasing animations of clouds, fog or smoke with Mathematica. My idea of "visually-pleasing" is along the lines of one of the images on the Wikipedia article for random Perlin noise.


enter image description here



Image description: "Perlin noise rescaled and added into itself to create fractal noise."



Based on the example MATLAB code found here, I wrote the following function in Mathematica:


perlin3D[n_, t_, r_] := Module[{s, w, i, d},
s = ConstantArray[0., {t, n, n}];
w = n;
i = 0;

While[w > 3,
i++;
d = GaussianFilter[RandomReal[{0, 1}, {t, n, n}], r*i];
s = s + i*d;
w = w - Ceiling[w/2 - 1];
];
s = (s - Min@s)/(Max@s - Min@s)
]

The results are OK, but not as good as I'd like. It's not as smooth as the example image above, nor is the image contrast as strong.



(* Generate 100 frames of 128*128 pixels *)
res = perlin3D[128, 100, 4];
imgres = Image@# &/@ res;
ListAnimate[imgres, 16]

enter image description here


How can I improve the quality of the generation using Mathematica, and is there anyway to speed it up for larger and/or longer animations?


Update


The contrast can be improved a little, as pointed out by N.J.Evans in a comment, by removing the first and last few frames before scaling, namely s = s[[r*i ;; -r*i]]. However it's still not as "fog-like" as the Wikipedia example.


enter image description here




Answer



This is a 2D Gaussian random field with a $1/k^2$ spectrum and linear dispersion $\omega \propto k$. I clip the field to positive values and square root it to give an edge to the "clouds".


n = 256;
k2 = Outer[Plus, #, #] &[RotateRight[N@Range[-n, n - 1, 2]/n, n/2]^2];

spectrum = With[{d := RandomReal[NormalDistribution[], {n, n}]},
(1/n) (d + I d)/(0.000001 + k2)];
spectrum[[1, 1]] *= 0;

im[p_] := Clip[Re[InverseFourier[spectrum Exp[I p]]], {0, ∞}]^0.5


p0 = p = Sqrt[k2];

Dynamic @ Image @ im[p0 += p]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.