Skip to main content

graphics - How to texturize a Disk/Circle/Rectangle?


The documentation for Texture states that "other filled objects" can be texturized:



Texture[obj] is a graphics directive that specifies that obj should be used as a texture on faces of polygons and other filled graphics objects.




And also:



Texture can be used in FaceForm to texture front and back faces differently.



Though I fail to apply a simple texture to any of the following objects. It seems like that "other filled objects" only include Polygons and FilledPolygons, and FaceForm does not work with those.


img = Rasterize@
DensityPlot[Sin@x Sin@y, {x, -4, 4}, {y, -3, 3},
ColorFunction -> "BlueGreenYellow", Frame -> None,
ImageSize -> 100, PlotRangePadding -> 0];

{
Graphics[{Texture@img, Disk[]}],
Graphics[{FaceForm@Texture@img, Disk[]}],
Graphics[{Texture@img, Rectangle[]}],
Graphics[{FaceForm@Texture@img, Rectangle[]}],

(* Only this one works *)
Graphics[{Texture@img,
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}],

Graphics[{FaceForm@Texture@img,
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}]
}

Mathematica graphics


Edit:


It turns out that "Applying Texture to a disk directly isn't possible" (according to Heike, thanks s.s.o. for the link). This unfortunately means that:



  1. the official documentation of Texture is wrong (or at least is misleading, as graphics objects usually include primitives);


  2. either Texture is not fully integrated with the system, as it is not applicable for such primitives as a Rectangle, which seems to be just a very specific Polygon; or Rectangle is something else and is defined some other way at the lowest level than a Polygon (maybe it is some OS-dependent object).


Frankly, it is quite hard to imagine what kept developers to include this functionality, but I must assume they had a good reason.



Answer



I noticed an example in the document of Texture which used the alpha channel. So I think a disk-shape primitive may be simulated to a limited degree by mapping the image img, which has been set to 100% transparent outside of the circle, onto a rectangle-shape Polygon.


My code:


img = Rasterize[
DensityPlot[Sin[x] Sin[y],
{x, -4, 4}, {y, -3, 3},
ColorFunction -> "BlueGreenYellow",

Frame -> None, ImageSize -> 100, PlotRangePadding -> 0
]];

imgdim = ImageDimensions[img]

alphamask = Array[
If[
Norm[{#1, #2} - imgdim/2] < imgdim[[1]]/2,
1,0]&,
imgdim];


alphaimg = MapThread[Append, {img // ImageData, alphamask}, 2];

Graphics[{
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}} + .3],
Texture[alphaimg],
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}
],
Gray, Disk[{0, 0}, .5]

}]

which gives result like this:


result graph


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....