Skip to main content

plotting - Specifying non-conflicting PlotTheme options


A bug or limitation in 10.0.0 affects a few of these examples; it was resolved in 10.1.0.




I am trying out Mathematica 10 on https://programming.wolframcloud.com. $PlotTheme interested me a lot because it finally produces nice plots (probably) without the need of fine tuning of every plot. However, the options are conflicting each other and there seems to be some hiding options. For example (figures available at https://www.wolframcloud.com/objects/0caeabc9-81ba-4c6c-a51d-64f06c644a40),


(* This get thick lines *)

LogPlot[{1/x, x,2x, E^x},{x,1,10},PlotTheme->{"ThickLines"}]

(* This get monochrome *)
LogPlot[{1/x, x,2x, E^x},{x,1,10},PlotTheme->{"Monochrome"}]

(* There is no monochrome or thick lines here *)
LogPlot[{1/x, x,2x, E^x},{x,1,10},PlotTheme->{"Monochrome","ThickLines"}]

As another example,


(* Didn't get open markers or monochrome, but at least get thick *)

ListPlot[{{{1,2},{2,4},{3,7},{4,9}},{{1,3},{2,4}}},PlotTheme->{"Monochrome","OpenMarkersThick"}]

(* After adding frame, markers completely changed *)
ListPlot[{{{1,2},{2,4},{3,7},{4,9}},{{1,3},{2,4}}},PlotTheme->{"Monochrome","Frame","OpenMarkersThick"}]

Is it possible to make those themes non-conflicting with each other? The theme seems perfect for me is as follows:


(1) The lines are solid, dashed, dotted, ... ("Monochrome")


(2) The lines are colored. (e.g. "VibrantColor")


(3) Framed ("Frame").


(4) Larger labels ("LargeLabels"). At best thicker lines ("ThickLines").



(5) Setting apply both to Plot and ListPlot (to put in $PlotTheme instead of tuning every plot).


But I am not able to get all of them satisfied -- once Plot looks fine, ListPlot looks ugly. Is it possible to get some non-conflicting fine tunings once and apply everywhere?



Answer



The details of the styles associated with various themes can be accessed using the function ResolvePlotThemes in the Charting context.


For example:


Grid[{#, Column@(Charting`ResolvePlotTheme[#, ListPlot] /. 
HoldPattern[PlotMarkers -> _] :> Sequence[])} & /@ {"Monochrome", "Frame", "Vibrant"},
Dividers -> All] (* removed the part related to PlotMarkers to save space *)

enter image description here



Similarly, for the themes "ThickLines" and "OpenMarkersThick"


 Grid[{#, Column@(Charting`ResolvePlotTheme[#, ListPlot] /. 
HoldPattern[PlotMarkers -> _] :> Sequence[])} & /@
{"ThickLines", "OpenMarkersThick"},
Dividers -> All]

enter image description here


So ...


(1) Depending on the order in which the themes appear on the RHS of PlotTheme->_ the conflicts are resolved in favor of earlier (or later ?) ones, that is, later (earlier ?) appearances of a given option are simply ignored.


(2) However, you can mix/match the relevant styling pieces from various themes. For example:



pltstylm = "DefaultPlotStyle" /. 
(Method /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Monochrome", ListLinePlot]);
pltstylv = "DefaultPlotStyle" /.
(Method /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Vibrant", ListLinePlot]);
pmrkrs = PlotMarkers /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["OpenMarkersThick", ListLinePlot];
frm = Frame /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Frame", ListLinePlot];
frmstyl = FrameStyle /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Frame", ListLinePlot];
grdlnsstyl = GridLinesStyle /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Monochrome", ListLinePlot];

ListPlot[{{{1, 2}, {2, 4}, {3, 7}, {4, 9}}, {{1, 3}, {2, 4}}},

PlotStyle->pltstylv, PlotMarkers->pmrkrs,Frame->frm,Joined->True,
FrameStyle->frmstyl,GridLines->Automatic,
GridLinesStyle->grdlnsstyl, ImageSize ->700]

enter image description here


ListPlot[{{{1, 2}, {2, 4}, {3, 7}, {4, 9}}, {{1, 3}, {2, 4}}},
PlotStyle->pltstylm, PlotMarkers->pmrkrs,Frame->frm,Joined->True,
FrameStyle->frmstyl, GridLines->Automatic,GridLinesStyle->grdlnsstyl,
ImageSize ->700]


enter image description here


 dashedVbrnt = Join[pltstylm,Rest@pltstylm];
dashedVbrnt[[All, 1]] = pltstylv[[All, 1]];
Plot[Evaluate@Table[BesselJ[n, x], {n, 5}], {x, 0, 10}, ImageSize ->400,
PlotStyle -> dashedVbrnt, PlotTheme -> "Detailed"]

enter image description here


ListPlot[Table[BesselJ[n, x], {n, 5}, {x, 0, 10,.3}], Filling->Axis,
ImageSize ->500, PlotStyle ->dashedVbrnt, PlotMarkers->pmrkrs, Joined->True,
PlotTheme ->"Detailed"]


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...