Skip to main content

numerical integration - highly oscillatory integral



Hi am trying to compute the following integral in Mathematica:


    NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[q]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[q]]])/(q+100),{q,0,Infinity}]

But when I run that command I get the following error:


    NIntegrate::ncvb: NIntegrate failed to converge to prescribed 
accuracy after 9 recursive bisections in q near {q} = {6.3887*10^56}.
NIntegrate obtained -317.031 and 171.60663912222586` for the integral
and error estimates.

Is there a way to solve this issue? Thanks




Answer



Here's a manual implementation of the extrapolating oscillatory strategy. NIntegrate balks at trying it because the cosine is buried inside other functions.


ClearAll[psum];
psum[i_?NumberQ, opts___] :=
NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100),
{x, (i + 1/2) π, (i + 3/2) π}, opts];

res = NSum[psum[i], {i, 0, ∞},
Method -> {"AlternatingSigns", Method -> "WynnEpsilon"},
"VerifyConvergence" -> False] +

NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100), {x, 0, (1/2) π}]
(*
0.00010967(-)
*)

This agrees with Chip Hurst's result to almost 5 digits. But the method is reasonably quick, so we can examine the convergence as the WorkingPrecision (and therefore the PrecisionGoal) is raised:


ClearAll[res];
mem : res[wp_: MachinePrecision] := mem =
NSum[psum[i, WorkingPrecision -> wp], {i, 0, ∞},
Method -> {"AlternatingSigns", Method -> "WynnEpsilon"},

"VerifyConvergence" -> False, WorkingPrecision -> wp] +
NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100),
{x, 0, (1/2) π}, WorkingPrecision -> wp];

Table[res[wp], {wp, 16, 40, 8}]
(*
{0.0001096696058468,
0.000109676059727856341260,
0.00010967605972782927874728238851,
0.0001096760597278292787470847687426733221}

*)

% // Differences
(*
{6.4538811*10^-9, -2.7062513*10^-17, -1.9761977*10^-25}
*)

At each step we extend the number of digits that agree, and we can see that the result seems reliable.




Alternatively, one can multiply and divide by cosine, which enables NIntegrate to use the "ExtrapolatingOscillatory" strategy. It's a bit slower because it introduces (integrable) singularities in the non-oscillatory part of the integrand, but again we get similar results.



ClearAll[res2];
mem : res2[wp_: MachinePrecision] := mem =
NIntegrate[Cos[q] (1/Sqrt[Abs[Cos[q]]])/(q + 100), {q, 0, Infinity},
Method -> "ExtrapolatingOscillatory",
MaxRecursion -> Ceiling[10 + 1.5 wp], (* increase in MaxRecursion for singularities *)
WorkingPrecision -> wp]

res2[]
(*
0.000109673

*)

Table[res2[wp], {wp, 16, 40, 8}]
(*
{0.0001096731867831,
0.000109676059727866251185,
0.00010967605972782927874731895632,
0.0001096760597278292787470847687424806474}
*)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....