Skip to main content

numerical integration - highly oscillatory integral



Hi am trying to compute the following integral in Mathematica:


    NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[q]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[q]]])/(q+100),{q,0,Infinity}]

But when I run that command I get the following error:


    NIntegrate::ncvb: NIntegrate failed to converge to prescribed 
accuracy after 9 recursive bisections in q near {q} = {6.3887*10^56}.
NIntegrate obtained -317.031 and 171.60663912222586` for the integral
and error estimates.

Is there a way to solve this issue? Thanks




Answer



Here's a manual implementation of the extrapolating oscillatory strategy. NIntegrate balks at trying it because the cosine is buried inside other functions.


ClearAll[psum];
psum[i_?NumberQ, opts___] :=
NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100),
{x, (i + 1/2) π, (i + 3/2) π}, opts];

res = NSum[psum[i], {i, 0, ∞},
Method -> {"AlternatingSigns", Method -> "WynnEpsilon"},
"VerifyConvergence" -> False] +

NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100), {x, 0, (1/2) π}]
(*
0.00010967(-)
*)

This agrees with Chip Hurst's result to almost 5 digits. But the method is reasonably quick, so we can examine the convergence as the WorkingPrecision (and therefore the PrecisionGoal) is raised:


ClearAll[res];
mem : res[wp_: MachinePrecision] := mem =
NSum[psum[i, WorkingPrecision -> wp], {i, 0, ∞},
Method -> {"AlternatingSigns", Method -> "WynnEpsilon"},

"VerifyConvergence" -> False, WorkingPrecision -> wp] +
NIntegrate[(Sign[Cos[x]] Sqrt[Abs[Cos[x]]])/(x + 100),
{x, 0, (1/2) π}, WorkingPrecision -> wp];

Table[res[wp], {wp, 16, 40, 8}]
(*
{0.0001096696058468,
0.000109676059727856341260,
0.00010967605972782927874728238851,
0.0001096760597278292787470847687426733221}

*)

% // Differences
(*
{6.4538811*10^-9, -2.7062513*10^-17, -1.9761977*10^-25}
*)

At each step we extend the number of digits that agree, and we can see that the result seems reliable.




Alternatively, one can multiply and divide by cosine, which enables NIntegrate to use the "ExtrapolatingOscillatory" strategy. It's a bit slower because it introduces (integrable) singularities in the non-oscillatory part of the integrand, but again we get similar results.



ClearAll[res2];
mem : res2[wp_: MachinePrecision] := mem =
NIntegrate[Cos[q] (1/Sqrt[Abs[Cos[q]]])/(q + 100), {q, 0, Infinity},
Method -> "ExtrapolatingOscillatory",
MaxRecursion -> Ceiling[10 + 1.5 wp], (* increase in MaxRecursion for singularities *)
WorkingPrecision -> wp]

res2[]
(*
0.000109673

*)

Table[res2[wp], {wp, 16, 40, 8}]
(*
{0.0001096731867831,
0.000109676059727866251185,
0.00010967605972782927874731895632,
0.0001096760597278292787470847687424806474}
*)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...