Skip to main content

Custom operators; custom pattern matching with pure functions


What I'm trying to achieve in Mathematica is the creation of a binary operator whose operands are both pure functions over the natural numbers. The result of the operator should be another pure function over the natural numbers.


To demonstrate concretely what I want, suppose I have the following functions defined:


f[n_Natural]:=2*n;
g[n_Natural]:=n-1;

(There is no Head called "Natural" so the above pattern matching won't work. But I want f and g to accept only natural numbers. This is problem No. 1 [SOLVED])


I then want a binary operator defined like so:


Needs["Notation`"];

CombinedFunction[f_NaturalFunction,g_NaturalFunction]:={#}/.{{x_Natural}:>f[#]+g[#]}}&;
InfixNotation[ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"], CombinedFunction];

Operating $f$ $\oplus$ $g$ yields a pure function $h$ that only takes a natural number as an argument. I have found a way of enforcing the domain of $h$ thanks to this thread, but I want to extend this to ensure that $\oplus$ itself is only defined for unary functions over the natural numbers. Seeing as there's no Head like 'NaturalFunction', I don't know how to do this. This is problem No. 2.


As an additional issue, the operator (which currently yields a function defined over the integers) currently gives an unsimplified output:


Needs["Notation`"];
CombinedFunction[f_, g_] := {#} /. {{x_Integer} :> f[x] + g[x]} &;
AddInputAlias["4" -> ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"]];
InfixNotation[ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"], CombinedFunction];


f=1&;
g=#&;
h=f\[CirclePlus]g


{#1} /. {{x$_Integer} :> (1 &)[x$] \[LeftRightArrow] (#1 &)[x$]} &

I would have expected the output to be:



(1+#)&


I'm unsure of the inner workings of what I've written so I don't know how to obtain a simplified result. I can now apply $h$ to an integer and it operates as expected. However:


h[3.5]


{3.5}

I want instead Mathematica to behave as if the function was simply undefined for anything but an integer, just as it would do if I defined $h$ like so:


Clear[h]; h[x_Integer]:=x+1;
h[3.5]



h[3.5]


Answer



Without giving this much thought you might proceed as follows:


naturalQ = IntegerQ[#] && Positive[#] &;

You can then define:


fn[n_?naturalQ] := 2*n;


fn /@ {-1, 0, 1}


{fn[-1], fn[0], 2}

For the second problem you might make use of SubValues syntax:


SetAttributes[nFun, HoldAll]

nFun[p_, body_][arg_?naturalQ] := With[{p = arg}, body]


Now:


nFun[x, x^2][8]
nFun[x, 2 x][8]
nFun[x, x+5][8]


64
16
13


You can define CirclePlus directly since it is an operator. You don't need the Notation package. (You can enter the \[CirclePlus] character with Escc+Esc.) Again using SubValues syntax:


CirclePlus[f_nFun, g_nFun][arg_?naturalQ] := f[arg] + g[arg]

Now:


f = nFun[x, x];
g = nFun[x, 1];
h = f \[CirclePlus] g
h[7]



8

This doesn't produce a Function object but perhaps it is sufficient. If it is not acceptable please explain how and why and I shall try again.




Anticipating a possible request, and also offering a variant, here is a method that makes use of Slot notation and yields partial evaluation:


ClearAll[nFun, CirclePlus]

SetAttributes[nFun, HoldFirst]
nFun[body_][arg__?naturalQ] := body &[arg]


CirclePlus[nFun[b1_], nFun[b2_]] := nFun[b1 + b2]

Now:


f = nFun[#];
g = nFun[1];

h = f\[CirclePlus]g
h[7]



nFun[#1 + 1]

8

For complete evaluation of the body you can use nFun @@ {b1 + b2} for the RHS of the second definition.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...