Skip to main content

Custom operators; custom pattern matching with pure functions


What I'm trying to achieve in Mathematica is the creation of a binary operator whose operands are both pure functions over the natural numbers. The result of the operator should be another pure function over the natural numbers.


To demonstrate concretely what I want, suppose I have the following functions defined:


f[n_Natural]:=2*n;
g[n_Natural]:=n-1;

(There is no Head called "Natural" so the above pattern matching won't work. But I want f and g to accept only natural numbers. This is problem No. 1 [SOLVED])


I then want a binary operator defined like so:


Needs["Notation`"];

CombinedFunction[f_NaturalFunction,g_NaturalFunction]:={#}/.{{x_Natural}:>f[#]+g[#]}}&;
InfixNotation[ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"], CombinedFunction];

Operating $f$ $\oplus$ $g$ yields a pure function $h$ that only takes a natural number as an argument. I have found a way of enforcing the domain of $h$ thanks to this thread, but I want to extend this to ensure that $\oplus$ itself is only defined for unary functions over the natural numbers. Seeing as there's no Head like 'NaturalFunction', I don't know how to do this. This is problem No. 2.


As an additional issue, the operator (which currently yields a function defined over the integers) currently gives an unsimplified output:


Needs["Notation`"];
CombinedFunction[f_, g_] := {#} /. {{x_Integer} :> f[x] + g[x]} &;
AddInputAlias["4" -> ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"]];
InfixNotation[ParsedBoxWrapper["\[CirclePlus]"], CombinedFunction];


f=1&;
g=#&;
h=f\[CirclePlus]g


{#1} /. {{x$_Integer} :> (1 &)[x$] \[LeftRightArrow] (#1 &)[x$]} &

I would have expected the output to be:



(1+#)&


I'm unsure of the inner workings of what I've written so I don't know how to obtain a simplified result. I can now apply $h$ to an integer and it operates as expected. However:


h[3.5]


{3.5}

I want instead Mathematica to behave as if the function was simply undefined for anything but an integer, just as it would do if I defined $h$ like so:


Clear[h]; h[x_Integer]:=x+1;
h[3.5]



h[3.5]


Answer



Without giving this much thought you might proceed as follows:


naturalQ = IntegerQ[#] && Positive[#] &;

You can then define:


fn[n_?naturalQ] := 2*n;


fn /@ {-1, 0, 1}


{fn[-1], fn[0], 2}

For the second problem you might make use of SubValues syntax:


SetAttributes[nFun, HoldAll]

nFun[p_, body_][arg_?naturalQ] := With[{p = arg}, body]


Now:


nFun[x, x^2][8]
nFun[x, 2 x][8]
nFun[x, x+5][8]


64
16
13


You can define CirclePlus directly since it is an operator. You don't need the Notation package. (You can enter the \[CirclePlus] character with Escc+Esc.) Again using SubValues syntax:


CirclePlus[f_nFun, g_nFun][arg_?naturalQ] := f[arg] + g[arg]

Now:


f = nFun[x, x];
g = nFun[x, 1];
h = f \[CirclePlus] g
h[7]



8

This doesn't produce a Function object but perhaps it is sufficient. If it is not acceptable please explain how and why and I shall try again.




Anticipating a possible request, and also offering a variant, here is a method that makes use of Slot notation and yields partial evaluation:


ClearAll[nFun, CirclePlus]

SetAttributes[nFun, HoldFirst]
nFun[body_][arg__?naturalQ] := body &[arg]


CirclePlus[nFun[b1_], nFun[b2_]] := nFun[b1 + b2]

Now:


f = nFun[#];
g = nFun[1];

h = f\[CirclePlus]g
h[7]



nFun[#1 + 1]

8

For complete evaluation of the body you can use nFun @@ {b1 + b2} for the RHS of the second definition.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....