Skip to main content

Detecting and correcting gradational brightness variations in a grayscale image


I am trying to quantify the proportions of various components in a greyscale image (backscattered electron image of a polished rock sample). Here is the original image:


bse = Import@"http://i.stack.imgur.com/eQece.png";


enter image description here


The image is comprised of components (minerals) that should have the same intensity response. For example, the abundant 'mid-grey' component (plagioclase) should have a fixed grey-level across the entire image. It doesn't.


By masking the other components of the image and adjusting the contrast, the gradations in brightness become more obvious:


bsek = ImageSubtract[bse, ColorNegate@Binarize[bse, {0.16, 0.24}]];
ImageAdjust[bsek, {3, 1.1}]

enter image description here


There seems to be two effects: a first order decrease in brightness towards the bottom corners and a second-order periodic vertical striping (comprised of short wavelength gradients).


Why bother? - Correcting for variations in brightness is an important step prior to segmentation analysis of the image



By approximating the variation in grey-values for the plagioclase, the difference in birghtness between the top and bottom of the image can be modelled (albeit crudely).


ksim[im_] := Module[{kdf, kdl},
kdf = SmoothKernelDistribution[First@im];
kdl = SmoothKernelDistribution[Last@im];
Plot[{PDF[kdf, x], PDF[kdl, x]}, {x, 0, 0.3}, Filling -> Axis,
Exclusions -> None]]
ksim[ImageData[bsek]]

enter image description here


The following creates a gradational filter that causes the grey-level peaks to overlap (by adjusting the value of shift).



bsedim = ImageDimensions[bse]
shift = 0.2;
grad = 1 +
Transpose@
Array[Table[x, {x, -shift, 0., shift/bsedim[[1]]}] &, bsedim[[1]]];
gradi = Image[grad];

bsekm = ImageMultiply[bsek, gradi];
ksim[ImageData[bsekm]]


enter image description here


This filter can then be applied to the original image:


bsem = ImageMultiply[bse, gradi]

enter image description here


This clumsy method does an OK job of levelling the first-order brightness defect. However, this effect looks to have a spherical gradient (dimmer in the bottom corners than the middle) which is not accounted for.


As yet, I have not found a way to correct the second order periodic effect.


Can anyone suggest a more straightforward way to detect and correct these kinds of brightness variation defects? Extra bonus gratitude to anyone who can help to correct the second-order periodic aberration.




Update



Here is a contrast stretched image showing the vertical aberrations:


 ImageAdjust[bse, {4.5, 3.85}]

enter image description here



Answer



Does this help? I've treated the error as additive, though you could easily change it to a multiplicative correction.


Starting with your bsek image, find the mean offset for rows and for columns:


id = ImageData[bsek];
horiz = (# - Mean[#]) &[Total[id]/Total[Unitize[id]]];
vert = (# - Mean[#]) &[Total[id, {2}]/Total[Unitize[id], {2}]];


ListLinePlot[horiz]
ListLinePlot[vert]

enter image description here enter image description here


The horizontal plot shows an overall darkening at the left and right sides of the image, plus the periodic component. The vertical plot shows an overall darkening towards the bottom of the image, with a periodic component also.


Combining the horizontal and vertical offsets into an overall offset:


a = Outer[Plus, vert, horiz];
Image[a] // ImageAdjust


enter image description here


Now subtract the offset from the original data:


bse2 = Image[ImageData[bse] - a]

enter image description here


Using s.s.o.'s ClusteringComponents visualisation appears to show an improvement:


ClusteringComponents[bse, 10] // Colorize
ClusteringComponents[bse2, 10] // Colorize

enter image description here enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw some 2D curves in a 3D plot?

I want to plot several 2D curves ( Sin[x] at y=0 , Cos[x] at y=1 ) in a 3D plot, what function should i use? f[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 0}, {Sin[x], y == 0}}] g[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 1}, {Cos[x], y == 1}}] Plot3D[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 10}] doesn't work. Any ideas? Answer ParametricPlot3D[{{Sin[u], 0, u}, {Cos[u], 1, u}}, {u, 0, 20}, BoxRatios -> 1, PlotRange -> {{-2, 2}, {-.5, 2}, {0, 20}}] === update - general thoughts === I've seen the comments to this question and a few other approaches to the waterfall (or wire) plot are given in this question: Plotting several functions . Also I cannot not mention one of my favorite Mathematica blogs - Archery with this post on the story of discovery of 1st pulsar and an its infamous graphics - code is given in the post: