Skip to main content

plotting - Traces of the level surface $z=4x^2+y^2$


I came up with this method to plot the traces of the surface $z=4x^2+y^2$, in this case for $z=1$, 2, 3, and 4.


ContourPlot3D[{z == 4 x^2 + y^2, z == 1, z == 2, z == 3, 
z == 4}, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, 0, 4.01},
ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},
PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3,
Mesh -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}}, MeshFunctions -> {#3 &},
MeshStyle -> {Thick, Red},

AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"}]

Which produces this image:


enter image description here


I am now looking for a way to hide the surface $z=4x^2+y^2$, but keep the planes and the mesh curves.


Any suggestions?


Update:


Consider obtaining traces for the surface $z=y^2-x^2$ using technique shown by MichaelE2.


ContourPlot3D[z, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, -1.5, 1.5}, 
Contours -> {-1, 0, 1}, ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},

PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3, Mesh -> {{0}},
MeshFunctions -> {Function[{x, y, z}, z - (y^2 - x^2)]},
MeshStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red], AxesLabel -> Automatic]

Image:


enter image description here


ContourPlot3D[x, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, -1.5, 1.5}, 
Contours -> {-1, 0, 1}, ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},
PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3, Mesh -> {{0}},
MeshFunctions -> {Function[{x, y, z}, z - (y^2 - x^2)]},

MeshStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red], AxesLabel -> Automatic]

Image:


enter image description here


ContourPlot3D[y, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, -1.5, 1.5}, 
Contours -> {-1, 0, 1}, ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},
PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3, Mesh -> {{0}},
MeshFunctions -> {Function[{x, y, z}, z - (y^2 - x^2)]},
MeshStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red], AxesLabel -> Automatic]


Image:


enter image description here


I think this gives students a very simple way to get the traces for a quadratic surface.



Answer



You could omit the (paraboloid) surface and use its formula as a mesh function:


ContourPlot3D[z, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, 0, 4.01}, 
Contours -> Range[4], ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},
PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3, Mesh -> {{0}},
MeshFunctions -> {Function[{x, y, z}, z - (4 x^2 + y^2)]},
MeshStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red], AxesLabel -> Automatic]


Mathematica graphics




You may like the simpler approach above, but if you want to get fancy, you could highlight the ellipses.


ContourPlot3D[z, {x, -2, 2}, {y, -2, 2}, {z, 0, 4.01}, 
Contours -> Range[4], ContourStyle -> {Opacity[0.3]},
PlotPoints -> 30, MaxRecursion -> 3, Mesh -> {Range[0.5, 3.5], {0}},
MeshShading -> {
{Opacity[ 0.2], ##} & @@@
("DefaultPlotStyle" /. (Method /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Default", ContourPlot3D])),

{Opacity[0.7], ##} & @@@
("DefaultPlotStyle" /. (Method /. Charting`ResolvePlotTheme["Default", ContourPlot3D]))
},
MeshFunctions -> {#3 &, Function[{x, y, z}, z - (4 x^2 + y^2)]},
MeshStyle -> Directive[Thick, Red], AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"}]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...