Skip to main content

differential equations - Neumann and Dirichlet eigenvalue problem - Eigenfunctions on the square



I don't know if I am in a good place to ask my question, but I'd like someone to create a visual support for a problem of mathematics. I was wondering what is the fundamental different between a Neumann eigenvalue problem and Dirichlet eigenvalue problem. I know that for DEP, we just fix the boundary (e.g. a drum), but what about the NEP. Now, consider a rectangle $\Omega = [0,l] \times [0,m]$. Separate variables using cartesian coordinates $x$ and $y$. That is, look for solution of the form $\varphi(x,y)=f(x)g(y)$


- Dirichlet boundary condition $\varphi| \partial \Omega=0$.


The eigenfunction are $$\varphi_{j,k}(x,y)= \sin(\frac{j \pi}{l}x) \sin (\frac{k \pi}{m}y) \text{ for } j,k \geq 1$$ and have eigenvalues $$\lambda_{j,k} = (\frac{j \pi}{l})^2 + (\frac{k \pi}{m})^2 \text{ for } j,k \geq 1$$


- Neumann boundary conditions $\partial_{\nu} \varphi | \partial \Omega = 0 $


The eigenfunction are $$\varphi_{j,k}(x,y)= \cos(\frac{j \pi}{l}x) \cos (\frac{k \pi}{m}y) \text{ for } j,k \geq 0$$ and have eigenvalues $$\lambda_{j,k} = (\frac{j \pi}{l})^2 + (\frac{k \pi}{m})^2 \text{ for } j,k \geq 0$$


With these informations, does someone could show me, in 3-D, some eigenfunctions on the square for DEP and NEP (with Mathematica)?



Answer




Her is a start:


Clear[ψD];
ψD[j_, k_][x_, y_] := Sin[j Pi x] Sin[k Pi y]

Clear[ψN];
ψN[j_, k_][x_, y_] := Cos[j Pi x] Cos[k Pi y]

ContourPlot[ψD[1, 2][x, y], {x, y} ∈
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}],
PlotPoints -> 100, AspectRatio -> Automatic, PlotRange -> All]


diri


ContourPlot[ψN[2, 2][x, y], {x, y} ∈ 
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}], PlotPoints -> 100,
AspectRatio -> Automatic, PlotRange -> All]

neumann


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...