Skip to main content

front end - How to stop TreeForm from shaking when changing resolution?


Update



(original question below kept as is).


I can reproduce this on version 11.1.1 on windows 7 as well as 11.0.1. (restarted Mathematica). Interesting is that it only shows on 125% resolution. Here is a gif


enter image description here


I am using one monitor, LG monitor, Ultra wide 34" if that makes any difference.


enter image description here




Original question


I like to set resolution of notebook to 125% instead of default 100%. But this causes TreeForm to keep shaking all the time which makes it hard to see.


Is there a way to stop the shaking at higher resolution?


Here is a MWE



s = Expand[5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y + 8]
TreeForm[s]

No shaking when notebook at 100%. But shaking shows up when changing to 125%. Here is a small gif


enter image description here


I used 11.0.1 here, since my 11.1.1 is busy now running and I can't use it for few hrs. Will also try this on 11.1.1 once done.


I also noticed something interesting. If I change expression and remove the +5 at the end, the shaking stops ! So this


s = Expand[5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y ]
TreeForm[s]


Causes no shaking at 125%. But 5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y +5 does (since it is a little wider tree now?). I also noticed if I grab the TreeForm with the mouse and drag it wider the shaking stops ! But this is hard to do each time, as you can see, I had hard time holding it and expanding it using the mouse:


enter image description here


Windows 7, 64 bit. Does this happen on other platforms?


Update:


Tried answer below and only first one causes shaking. Here is gif


enter image description here



Answer



Try the following:


s = Expand[5 (Sin[x] y + x)/y + 8];
RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s]


If that also exhibits shaking, then try the following:


RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s, PlotRangePadding->0]
RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s] /. _Scaled->0
TreeForm[s, VertexLabeling->None]
TreeForm[s, ImagePadding->0]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.