Skip to main content

front end - How to stop TreeForm from shaking when changing resolution?


Update



(original question below kept as is).


I can reproduce this on version 11.1.1 on windows 7 as well as 11.0.1. (restarted Mathematica). Interesting is that it only shows on 125% resolution. Here is a gif


enter image description here


I am using one monitor, LG monitor, Ultra wide 34" if that makes any difference.


enter image description here



Original question


I like to set resolution of notebook to 125% instead of default 100%. But this causes TreeForm to keep shaking all the time which makes it hard to see.


Is there a way to stop the shaking at higher resolution?


Here is a MWE



s = Expand[5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y + 8]
TreeForm[s]

No shaking when notebook at 100%. But shaking shows up when changing to 125%. Here is a small gif


enter image description here


I used 11.0.1 here, since my 11.1.1 is busy now running and I can't use it for few hrs. Will also try this on 11.1.1 once done.


I also noticed something interesting. If I change expression and remove the +5 at the end, the shaking stops ! So this


s = Expand[5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y ]
TreeForm[s]


Causes no shaking at 125%. But 5*(Sin[x] y + x)/y +5 does (since it is a little wider tree now?). I also noticed if I grab the TreeForm with the mouse and drag it wider the shaking stops ! But this is hard to do each time, as you can see, I had hard time holding it and expanding it using the mouse:


enter image description here


Windows 7, 64 bit. Does this happen on other platforms?


Update:


Tried answer below and only first one causes shaking. Here is gif


enter image description here



Answer



Try the following:


s = Expand[5 (Sin[x] y + x)/y + 8];
RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s]


If that also exhibits shaking, then try the following:


RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s, PlotRangePadding->0]
RawBoxes @ ToBoxes @ TreeForm[s] /. _Scaled->0
TreeForm[s, VertexLabeling->None]
TreeForm[s, ImagePadding->0]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more