Skip to main content

interoperability - How can multiple null terminated strings be handled in a DLL-function result?


I am trying to connect a classic System Dynamics tool (Vensim DSS) with Mathematica using a DLL that is included in Vensim DSS. Reading though the instructions on how to define DLL functions on how to declare arguments - here strings - I found that if there are [out] strings one should use the .NET class System.Text.StringBuilder.


So applying the advice given will look like this:


(* definitions *)
$maxBufLen = 1000;
strOutput = NETNew["System.Text.StringBuilder", $maxBufLen];

vensimGetInfo = DefineDLLFunction["vensim_get_info", vensimDLL,
"int", {"int", "System.Text.StringBuilder", "int"}];

(* usage *)
infoWanted = 3; bufLen = $maxBufLen;
vensimGetInfo[infoWanted, strOutput, bufLen];
strOuput@ToString[]

Unfortunately this only works properly for a single string and some information will be returned by the DLL function as a series of null terminated strings that is finally ended by a double null. In such a case the above procedure will only return the first string omitting the rest.


What can be done?




Answer



First off, I should mention that Vensim also has a Java interface that you could call using J/Link. The Java signature of this particular function is


static String[] get_info(int infowanted);

so you can see that the different strings are conveniently returned in an array for you.


But you can also do what you want using .NET/Link's DefineDLLFunction. You have to drop down to low-level memory allocations. Declare the buffer that will be filled with the strings as an IntPtr:


vensimGetInfo = DefineDLLFunction["vensim_get_info", vensimDLL, "int", {"int", "IntPtr", "int"}];

Then allocate a buffer of a size large enough to hold all the data:


LoadNETType["System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal"];

buf = Marshal`AllocHGlobal[$maxBufLen];

Call the DLL function:


infoWanted = 3;
numBytes = vensimGetInfo[infoWanted, buf, $maxBufLen];

One way to get the data from buf is to copy it into a .NET array, and then use NETObjectToExpression to convert it into a list of character values.


managedArray = NETNew["System.Byte[]", numBytes];
Marshal`Copy[buf, managedArray, 0, numBytes];
bytes = NETObjectToExpression[managedArray]


bytes will look something like {100, 105, ..., 0, 97, 100, ..., 0, 105, 102, ... 0, 0}. Use whatever method you like to convert these character values into separate strings, such as


FromCharacterCode[DeleteCases[SplitBy[bytes, # != 0 &], {0..}]]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...