Skip to main content

computational geometry - Finding non-collinear vertices of a convex hull


I'm fairly new to Mathematica (and programming in general tbh) and need this for a math project I'm working on.


I generate large collections of (rational, 2d) points and need to find which of these points are the vertices of the convex hull.


Some googling suggested that MeshCoordinates would do this, but it does not exclude points on the edges of the convex hull that are collinear with the vertices. It also gives rounded decimals but that is less of an issue.


Is there a simple way to do this?


Edit to include a simplified example, the vertices of the unit square with a redundant point ({1, .5}):


pts = {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, .5}}


Both MeshCoordinates[ConvexHullMesh[pts]] and ConvexHullMesh[pts]["VertexCoordinates"] return the point {1, .5}, which is clearly not a vertex of the unit square.


The points I'm generating are not random, they are the result of a fairly involved set of calculations and many of them can be collinear.



Answer



Update: a brute force approach to eliminate coordinates that lie in the convex hull of other coordinates:


ClearAll[noncollinearF]
noncollinearF[verts_]:= Function[{k}, Nor @@ (RegionMember[ConvexHullMesh[#],k]&/@ 
    Subsets[Complement[verts,{k}],{2}])]

Pick[#, noncollinearF[#] /@ #]&[Rationalize @ ConvexHullMesh[pts]["VertexCoordinates"]]



{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}



Pick[#, noncollinearF[#] /@ #]&[Rationalize@ConvexHullMesh[pts2]["VertexCoordinates"]]


{{0, 0}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}, {2, 1}}



Or define a function that picks the non-collinear vertices of the convex hull of a set of 2D points:



ncvF = With[{v = #}, Pick[v, Function[{k}, Nor @@ (RegionMember[ConvexHullMesh[#],k]&/@ 
    Subsets[Complement[v,{k}],{2}])]/@v]]&;

 ncvF[pts]


{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}}



 ncvF[pts2]



{{0, 0}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}, {2, 1}}



Previous post:


The function Geometry`ConvexHull2 gives the desired coordinates for the simple example:


pts = {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1,1/2}};

chm = ConvexHullMesh[pts];
vertices = Rationalize[chm["VertexCoordinates"]] (* or MeshCoordinates[chm] *)



{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1/2}}



strictvertices = Rationalize[Geometry`ConvexHull2[ pts]]


{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}



Show[chm, Graphics@Point[pts], Graphics[{Red, PointSize[Large], Point @ vertices}]]


Mathematica graphics


Show[chm, Graphics@Point[pts], Graphics[{Red, PointSize[Large], Point @ strictvertices}]]

Mathematica graphics


... but, it fails to eliminate some coordinates in an other example:


pts2 = {{0, 0}, {1/2, 0}, {1/2, 1/2}, {1, 1}, {3/2, 1}, {1, 0}, {2, 1}, {3/2, 1/2}}

Show[ConvexHullMesh[pts2], Graphics @ Point[pts2], 
 Graphics[{Red, PointSize[Large], Point @ Geometry`ConvexHull2[ pts2]}]]


Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more