Skip to main content

function construction - Pattern that matches colors


Suppose I'm writing a function that takes a color as a parameter; for example:



drawShape[color_] := Graphics[{Style[Disk[], color]}];

But if the caller inputs an invalid color, bad things happen:


Bad


So I want to use a pattern to define drawShape only for values that are actually colors. Conceptually,


drawShape[color_Color] := ...

The problem is that unlike (say) Lists, Integers, Reals, Complexes, or Graphicses, color objects do not share a Color head. That is,


In[1]:= Red // Head
Out[1]= RGBColor

In[2]:= Hue[0.5] // Head
Out[2]= Hue
In[3]:= GrayLevel[0.5] // Head
Out[3]= GrayLevel
In[4]:= CMYKColor[0, 1, 1, 1/2] // Head
Out[4]= CMYKColor
In[4]:= Opacity[0.5, Purple] // Head
Out[4]= Opacity
In[5]:= Transparent // Head
Out[5]= GrayLevel


So that won't work. I also don't see any ColorQ function, with which I could write drawShape[color_ ? ColorQ] := ....


How can I write a pattern that matches any valid color object? Is there a more robust way than just testing for each of these heads?



Answer



Original method


colorQ = Quiet @ Check[Blend @ {#, Red}; True, False] &;

colorQ /@ {Red, Hue[0.5], GrayLevel[0.5], CMYKColor[0, 1, 1, 1/2], Opacity[0.5, Purple]}



{True, True, True, True, True}

colorQ /@ {17, 1.3, Pi, "not a color", {1, 2, 3}, Hue["bad arg"]}


{False, False, False, False, False, False}

You would use: drawShape[color_?colorQ] := . . .



Inspired by kguler's comment this might also be formulated as:



colorQ = Quiet[Head @ Darker @ # =!= Darker] &;

Or:


colorQ = FreeQ[Quiet @ Darker @ #, Darker] &;

Edit: Darker works on entire Image and Graphics objects and therefore the two forms immediately above will incorrectly return True in these cases. Blend solution is still valid.



Version 10 update and analysis


In version 10 there is a built-in function for this: ColorQ




ColorQ[color] yields True if color is a valid color directive and False otherwise.



A bit of spelunking reveals that the inner definition of this function is (contexts stripped for clarity):


iColorQ[args_?(ColorDirectiveQ[Head[#1[[1]]]] &), opts_] := 
  NumberQ[Quiet[ToColor[args[[1]], XYZColor][[1]]]]

This is very similar to my own method, however the inner definition of ColorDirectiveQ omits Opacity:


iColorDirectiveQ[args_, opts_] := 
 TrueQ[Quiet[
   MatchQ[args[[1]], 

    GrayLevel | RGBColor | CMYKColor | Hue | XYZColor | LUVColor | LABColor | LCHColor]]]

This means that the function will return False for e.g. Opacity[0.5, Purple] where mine returns True.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more