Skip to main content

how can I solve integrals including recursion of some sequences of functions


I would like to solve the equations as given below in mathematica. I have written some codes before but I have no idea when there is sub indexing to indicate the series of functions. I will be very happy and grateful if you could help me. Here are the equations:


$$P[n]=\int_{(-\infty,B)\cup (A,\infty)} q_n (x) \mathrm{d}x$$


and


$$q_n(x)=\int_{B}^A q_{n-1} (\omega)f(x-\omega)\mathrm{d} \omega,\quad q_1=f,\quad n\geq 1.$$ and $f$ is some density function, say standard Gaussian density. Eventually, I want to obtain the probability mass $P[n]$.


Thank you very much!





I wrote this (from Hector's post):


f0[x_] := 1/Sqrt[2*Pi*1^2]*E^(-(x + 1)^2/(2*1^2))
q[n_ /; n > 1, B_, A_, f_][x_] := NIntegrate[q[n - 1, B, A, f][ω] f[x - ω], {ω, B, A}]
q[1, B_, A_, f_][x_] :=f[x]
p[n_, B_, A_, f_] := NIntegrate[q[n, B, A, f][x], {x, -∞, B}] +
NIntegrate[q[n, B, A, f][x], {x, A, ∞}]

N[p[1, -2, 2, f0[x]]] --> 0.160005
N[p[2, -2, 2, f0[x]]] --> 0.35594
N[p[3, -2, 2, f0[x]]] --> 0.237045

N[p[4, -2, 2, f0[x]]] --> 0.229432
N[p[5, -2, 2, f0[x]]] --> 0.222063

...


these results seem incorrect because $p$ is the probability mass function and should add up to $1$.


Correct results for $f_0$ Gaussian with mean $-1$ and variance $1$ and $A=2$ and $B=-2$:


n=1-->0.1600
n=2-->0.3559
n=3-->0.2323
n=4-->0.1238

n=5-->0.0633
n=6-->0.0320
n=7-->0.0162

Answer



Since OP seems to be interested in numerical calculations, this might be more suitable:


f0[x_]:= 1/Sqrt[2*Pi*1^2]*E^(-(x + 1)^2/(2*1^2))

q[1, A_, B_, f_] := f

q[n_ /; n > 1, A_, B_, f_][x_] :=

Module[{ω},tempIntegrate[Evaluate[q[n - 1, A, B, f]][ω] f[x - ω], {ω, A, B}]]

p[n_, A_, B_, f_] :=
tempIntegrate[q[n, A, B, f][x], {x, -∞, B}] +
tempIntegrate[q[n, A, B, f][x], {x, A, ∞}] //. {
s_ tempIntegrate[a_, b__] :> tempIntegrate[s a, b],
tempIntegrate[tempIntegrate[a_, b__], c__] :> tempIntegrate[a, b, c] } /.
tempIntegrate -> NIntegrate

Then, as a test case, p[3, -2, 2, f0] evaluates to 0.73581.





Original answer


The subindices are really parameters. One way to do it is to include the parameters along with the variables (see how Mathematica does it for the Legrendre polynomials for example). Subindices could also be part of the head of the function, for example f[a][x] can be thought of as the function $f_a(x)$.


The code you need is as below. Note that A and B are also parameters (and that I changed their order respect to your post).


q[n_ /; n > 1, A_, B_, f_][x_] := Integrate[q[n - 1, A, B, f][ω] f[x - ω], {ω, A, B}]
q[1, A_, B_, f_][x_] := HoldForm@f[x]
p[n_, A_, B_, f_] := Integrate[q[n, A, B, f][x], {x, -∞, A}] +
Integrate[q[n, A, B, f][x], {x, B, ∞}]

I included a HoldForm to check whether the recursion is correct. The following input



p[2, 1, 3, Exp[-#^2] &]

produces


enter image description here


You might want to erase "HoldForm@" from the code above to get the actual answer. That is, change the second line to


q[1, A_, B_, f_][x_] := f[x]

Now, depending on the function f, Mathematica might take a long time to answer if you leave those integrals in analytic form. You might want to replace Integrate by NItegrate if you are interested in a numerical approximation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....