Skip to main content

geometry - Generate regularly spaced points from the surface of simplexes


I need to generate regularly spaced samples (points) from the surface of unit simplexes with 2 or greater vertices or end points.



I can generate random samples pretty straightforwardly:


sampleSimplex[sampleSize_, vertices_] := 
Module[{s},
s = RandomReal[ExponentialDistribution[2], {sampleSize, vertices}];
Map[Normalize[#, Total] &, s]]

Graphics3D[Point /@ sampleSimplex[1000, 3], ImageSize -> 150,
BoxStyle -> Directive[LightGray], ViewPoint -> {Pi, Pi/2, 2}]

simplex samples



This works nicely and enables me to specify the number of samples and the number of vertices, but as I stated above I want to generate regularly spaced points, kind of like a Mesh on a 3D plot (but not limited to 3 dimensions).


I can also do it for 2 vertices pretty simply:


sampleSimplexWith2Vertices[sampleSize_] := Module[{temp},
temp = N[Range[0, 1, 1/sampleSize]];
Transpose[{temp, Reverse[temp]}]]

sampleSimplexWith2Vertices[10]

{{0., 1.}, {0.1, 0.9}, {0.2, 0.8}, {0.3, 0.7}, {0.4, 0.6}, {0.5,
0.5}, {0.6, 0.4}, {0.7, 0.3}, {0.8, 0.2}, {0.9, 0.1}, {1., 0.}}


ListPlot[%, ImageSize -> 200]

enter image description here


but I seem blocked in thinking about a solution that extends further.


Any suggestions for how to approach this problem appreciated.


I recognize that this may appear too narrow in scope or that it seems more like a conceptual problem of how to think about the problem more than how to implement an idea in Mathematica. I can withdrawal the question, if either of those seems like the consensus.


I hoped that the approaches I've tried so far and those the question might draw would have sufficient general interest to merit some responses.




In the interest of improving the question I wanted to incorporate @Rahul_Narain's idea from his comment:



sampleSimplexWith3Vertices[pointsPerSide_] := N@Select[
Flatten[
Table[{x, y, 1 - x - y}, {x, 0, 1, 1/pointsPerSide}, {y, 0, 1,
1/pointsPerSide}], 1], #[[3]] >= 0 &]

sampleSimplexWith3Vertices[10];

enter image description here


This works for 3 vertices, where one specifies the number of points per side. But, how does one generalize this for an arbitrary number of vertices (dimensions)? I've thought that Table would give one way to go about this, but wouldn't generalizing this with Table need a way to change just about everything between its brackets?



Answer




First, define some functions:



  • simpleVertices returns the simplex corners for 1, 2, 3 dimensions;

  • toCartesian converts simplex coordinates to Cartesian coordinates;

  • simplexPoints generates regularly placed points according to dimension and resolution (default 10)


Note that regular points for $n$ dimensions are generated by injecting $n$ dependent iterators (var) into a Table:


simplexVertices[dim_Integer] := Switch[dim,
1, {{0, 0}, {1, 0}},
2, {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1/2, Sqrt@3/2}},

3, {{0, 0, 0}, {1, 0, 0}, {1/2, Sqrt@3/2, 0}, {1/2, Sqrt@3/6, Sqrt@6/3}}];

toCartesian[pts : {__List}, dim_Integer] := toCartesian[#, dim] & /@ pts;
toCartesian[pt_List, dim_Integer] := Total[pt*simplexVertices@dim];

simplexPoints[dim_Integer, res_Integer: 10] := Module[{var, iter},
var = Unique@"i" & /@ Range@dim;
iter = {var[[#]], 0, 1 - Total@Take[var, # - 1], 1/res} & /@ Range@dim;
Flatten[Table @@ Fold[Append, {Append[var, 1 - Total@var]}, iter], dim - 1]];


Now evaluate for 1, 2, 3 dimensions:


{
Graphics[Point@toCartesian[simplexPoints@1, 1]],
Graphics[Point@toCartesian[simplexPoints@2, 2]],
Graphics3D[Point@toCartesian[simplexPoints@3, 3]]
}

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.