Skip to main content

Defining a function via pattern matching with SeriesData


I want to define a function myLO that gives me the leading order of a series expansion in Mathematica (the whole term, not just the coefficent).


My idea is, given that any series expansion in Mathematica has de form SeriesData[x, x0, {a0, a1, ...}, nmin, nmax, den] I can use this structure to construct my function. I did it the following way:


myLO[SeriesData[x_,x0_,coefs_List,nmin_Integer,nmax_Integer,den_Integer]]:=First@coefs Power[(x-x0),nmin/den]

And it works OK, e.g.



serie = Series[ Exp[x-1]/Sqrt[x-1],{x,1,3}]

myLO[serie]
(* 1/Sqrt[-1 + x] *)

But in the definition it gives me an error:


SeriesData::sdatc: "Coefficient specification coefs_List in SeriesData[x_,x0_,coefs_List,nmin_Integer,nmax_Integer,den_Integer] is not a list."

I don't understand this error, I am specifying that the header of lcoefsmust be List, but the function seems to do not notice it. I can write {a__} instead, and it won't trigger (but it will complain about the integers), but I want to handle the list as a whole.


How can I avoid this? Or how can I improve this definition?




Answer



Explanation


Using the construction arg_List indeed specifies that arg should be given as a list, and this is a correct construction to match an expression of the form arg = {subexpression} when the outer head enclosing arg_List does not evaluate.


For instance, the function f defined by


f[g[arg_List]] := Total[arg]

expects an argument with head List in order to trigger the right-hand side. The difference with your situation comes from the symbol g. In the above, there is no definition associated to it; in your example, g is SeriesData and there is a definition associated to it.


What happens is that the expression


SeriesData[x_, x0_, coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer]


evaluates (even though it is written in a SetDelayed construction --- see below). Since SeriesData is expecting a list as a third argument and integers afterwards, it will complain when given arguments with other heads:


Head /@ {coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer}
(* {Pattern, Pattern, Pattern, Pattern} *)

After throwing the error message, the same expression SeriesData[...] will be returned, the definition will be constructed with this expression, and the latter will be used subsequently for the pattern-matching, which explains why an output is still generated when calling the definition.


Solution


The solution to make this work is to wrap the expression in the symbol HoldPattern, in order to prevent the evaluation of the expression.


Defining


myLO[HoldPattern@ 
SeriesData[x_, x0_, coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer]

] := First@coefs Power[(x - x0), nmin/den]

will not generate any error messages.


Additional comments


The fact that a symbol has the attribute HoldAll does not mean that it will not evaluate its arguments. It means instead that its definition is triggered before evaluating the arguments.


Evaluation of those arguments will then depend on the internal of the function. So, the arguments may not be evaluated at all, or they can be evaluated once, or several times. About SetDelayed, its first argument (left-hand side) does evaluate, as shown by the generated error message.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...