Skip to main content

Defining a function via pattern matching with SeriesData


I want to define a function myLO that gives me the leading order of a series expansion in Mathematica (the whole term, not just the coefficent).


My idea is, given that any series expansion in Mathematica has de form SeriesData[x, x0, {a0, a1, ...}, nmin, nmax, den] I can use this structure to construct my function. I did it the following way:


myLO[SeriesData[x_,x0_,coefs_List,nmin_Integer,nmax_Integer,den_Integer]]:=First@coefs Power[(x-x0),nmin/den]

And it works OK, e.g.



serie = Series[ Exp[x-1]/Sqrt[x-1],{x,1,3}]

myLO[serie]
(* 1/Sqrt[-1 + x] *)

But in the definition it gives me an error:


SeriesData::sdatc: "Coefficient specification coefs_List in SeriesData[x_,x0_,coefs_List,nmin_Integer,nmax_Integer,den_Integer] is not a list."

I don't understand this error, I am specifying that the header of lcoefsmust be List, but the function seems to do not notice it. I can write {a__} instead, and it won't trigger (but it will complain about the integers), but I want to handle the list as a whole.


How can I avoid this? Or how can I improve this definition?




Answer



Explanation


Using the construction arg_List indeed specifies that arg should be given as a list, and this is a correct construction to match an expression of the form arg = {subexpression} when the outer head enclosing arg_List does not evaluate.


For instance, the function f defined by


f[g[arg_List]] := Total[arg]

expects an argument with head List in order to trigger the right-hand side. The difference with your situation comes from the symbol g. In the above, there is no definition associated to it; in your example, g is SeriesData and there is a definition associated to it.


What happens is that the expression


SeriesData[x_, x0_, coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer]


evaluates (even though it is written in a SetDelayed construction --- see below). Since SeriesData is expecting a list as a third argument and integers afterwards, it will complain when given arguments with other heads:


Head /@ {coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer}
(* {Pattern, Pattern, Pattern, Pattern} *)

After throwing the error message, the same expression SeriesData[...] will be returned, the definition will be constructed with this expression, and the latter will be used subsequently for the pattern-matching, which explains why an output is still generated when calling the definition.


Solution


The solution to make this work is to wrap the expression in the symbol HoldPattern, in order to prevent the evaluation of the expression.


Defining


myLO[HoldPattern@ 
SeriesData[x_, x0_, coefs_List, nmin_Integer, nmax_Integer, den_Integer]

] := First@coefs Power[(x - x0), nmin/den]

will not generate any error messages.


Additional comments


The fact that a symbol has the attribute HoldAll does not mean that it will not evaluate its arguments. It means instead that its definition is triggered before evaluating the arguments.


Evaluation of those arguments will then depend on the internal of the function. So, the arguments may not be evaluated at all, or they can be evaluated once, or several times. About SetDelayed, its first argument (left-hand side) does evaluate, as shown by the generated error message.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],